This report provides a 2020 update of 2014 and 2017 assessments of the East and South Chatham Rise orange roughy stock, to enable an HCR-derived recommended catch limit for 2020–21. Three age-structured Bayesian population models were fitted to biomass and composition data. Virgin biomass (B0) was estimated as 300 000–350 000 t and 2020 stock status from the base case model was 36% B0 (± 95% CIs of 30 to 41%). With a vulnerable biomass of 157 000 t, the HCR-derived recommended catch limit was 6348 t for 2020–21, with a slowing increasing population over future years.
Published
Last updated
ISBN Online
978-1-991120-95-3
ISSN Online
1179-5352
FAR 2024/10 Rock lobster catch and effort data: 1979–80 to 2022–23
This report summarises commercial catch and effort statistics for rock lobsters, which are also known in New Zealand as “crayfish” or “kōura”.
The summaries presented in this document cover the rock lobster legal fishing years (1 April–31 March) for April 1979 to March 2023.
There are nine Quota Management Areas (QMAs) that cover all inshore waters of the North Island, the South Island, and the Chatham Islands. There are 43 smaller statistical areas that lie within these nine QMAs. The summaries are ordered by QMA, with each QMA identified by a three-letter code and a number. The rock lobster code is CRA, so the nine QMAs are labelled CRA 1 to CRA 9.
The first three tables for each CRA QMA summarise, by statistical area and fishing year, (1) number of vessels, (2) catch, and (3) effort. The last category is defined as the total number of rock lobster pots lifted within each fishing year and statistical area. The fourth table summarises catch by month and fishing year for the entire QMA, and a fifth table gives the monthly catch by statistical area for just the final fishing year, which is 2022–23 in this document.
The sixth table for each QMA summarises catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) by statistical area and fishing year. CPUE in this table is defined as the catch (in kilograms) from the second table divided by the number of potlifts in the third table. There is a seventh table providing CPUE that has gone through a mathematical procedure called “standardisation” which attempts to factor out aspects of the CPUE which might change over time. The standardisation procedure has been suspended beginning with 2019–20 because there are comparability issues associated with the changeover from paper forms to electronic reporting.
Limited information is available on the understanding and preferences of the young, old, pregnant, and immunocompromised consumers on food safety matters. As such the outcomes of this report will be used to inform NZFS risk management/risk communication activities i.e., the development and implementation of strategies/food safety messaging/campaigns used to engage with YOPI.
Published
Last updated
Risk profile: Salmonella (non typhoidal) in and on eggs (2023)
The purpose of this project is to review and revise current methods and assumptions in AIM for birth and slaughter dates for individual classes of sheep and beef cattle grown for finishing. The current analysis suggests that a few birth and slaughter variables and assumptions in AIM will need additional consideration.
Development of a software tool to automate the generation of the uncertainty calculation table reported in the national inventory for the agriculture sector of the greenhouse gas inventory.
Published
Last updated
ISBN Online
978-1-991120-79-3
ISSN Online
2253-3923
Information on dairy farming systems: Determining Feed Eaten by New Zealand Dairy Cows 1990-2020 through Combining Data Sets
Within the dairy sector, several databases exist that have recorded farms, animals, and milk production over time, as well as feed use both through time and seasonally. This report assesses the feasibility of combining these databases to provide monthly estimates of feeds (grown on farm and imported) eaten by dairy cows from 1990 to 2020 for different types of farm systems and regions of New Zealand.
The purpose of this project was to evaluate the potential number of livestock carried on lifestyle blocks and blocks of land not included in the sampling frame of the Agricultural Production Survey (APS) and to evaluate the potential impacts on these stocks on agricultural greenhouse gas emissions.
Published
Last updated
ISBN Online
978-1-991120-77-9
ISSN Online
2253-3923
FAR 2024/09 Estimation of finfish release survival from New Zealand inshore commercial fisheries
This study estimated the post-release survival of inshore finfish with current commercial minimum legal sizes—blue cod, blue moki, butterfish, kingfish, red moki, red cod, sand flounder, snapper, tarakihi, trevally, and yellowbelly flounder—and those currently allowed to be returned under disposal code X— kingfish, rig, sand flounder, school shark, rough skate, smooth skate, and spiny dogfish.
A questionnaire was developed and circulated to fishers, fishery observers, and scientists with knowledge of each species to obtain their estimates of at-release survival (i.e., the probability the fish/shark was alive when put back into water) and post-release survival (the probability an individual was both alive at release and survived following release). Estimates were obtained for each gear type as well as fishing categories within each gear type, e.g., duration, depth, and bag size. For some species, estimates of post- release survival were informed by literature on the survival of same or similar species.
These data were used with fishery characterisations to model the survival for each species. For species with a minimum legal size, both at-release and post-release survival estimates were used, whereas for those species released under disposal code X, which may only be released if alive and likely to survive, only the post-release survival estimates were used.
The post-release survival from longlines for snapper, kingfish, and rough skate (assuming they are released alive) was “medium-high”, i.e., the lower bootstrapped 90% confidence range was lower than 0.50, but greater than 0.25, and upper 90% confidence range exceeded 0.75. The same survival range was estimated for snapper caught in pots. For snapper, this result was based on expert knowledge and incorporated literature-based mean values based on empirical studies for this species in New Zealand.
However, for rough skate, the result was based on the informed opinion of 2 science experts only (at-vessel survival was assumed to be 100%) and without the benefit of literature-based empirical estimates as none exist for this species. If at-release survival estimates are included for kingfish, the range decreases to “medium”. For blue cod, and other sharks, skates, and rays, survival from capture on bottom longline was “medium-low”. Red cod survival was “low”, and an “uncertain” outcome was applied to smooth skate and blue moki due to the lack of available knowledge. For species such as spiny dogfish and school shark, the lower range of perceived survival was at least partially a result of the wide range of depths where these species are discarded, which includes deepwater fisheries with larger vessels and potentially different handling practices.
Post-release survival of most species from trawl gear was perceived to be “medium-low” at best, with 90% confidence range either spanning 0.25 up to but less than 0.75, or else between 0.25 and 0.5. Blue cod, red cod, flatfish, and tarakihi were considered in the “low” range, where the 90% confidence range did not exceed 0.25. Survival of both rough and smooth skates in trawl gear was “uncertain”, based on the lack of empirical data for these species and the wide range of estimates for related species in overseas fisheries. Where bottom trawl with a Modular Harvest System cod-end was considered as a separate gear, the lack of available data on this gear type meant survival was considered “uncertain”. For set net, the perceived survival of all species where this gear was considered an important method, was “medium-low”.
The species-method survival confidence ranges presented in this report are based on the best currently available expert knowledge and thorough reviews of the current survival literature; as such, these ranges are unlikely to be improved upon without further investment in release survival research.