Code of Welfare: Goats

The purpose of this Code is to provide information to the owners and persons in charge of goats about the standards they must achieve in order to meet their obligations under the Animal Welfare Act 1999.

This Code of Welfare encourages all those responsible for goats to adopt the highest standards of husbandry, care and handling, and to equal or exceed the minimum standards. Goats in New Zealand are commonly farmed for the purposes of milk, fibre (mohair and cashmere) and meat production.

Adequately maintaining the welfare of goats requires experience, training and the observance of high standards.

Background

The Animal Welfare Act 1999 provides for the welfare of animals in New Zealand. It puts obligations on people who own or are in charge of animals to provide for the welfare of their animals.

The Act establishes the fundamental obligations relating to the care of animals and provides for the development and issue of codes of welfare.

Codes of welfare expand on the basic obligations of the Act by setting minimum standards and recommending best practice for the care and management of animals.

This Code of Welfare also references regulations issued under the Animal Welfare Act 1999. Regulations are prescribed under the Animal Welfare Act and impose enforceable requirements on owners and persons in charge of animals. For ease of reference, regulations relevant to this Code are set out in an appendix to this Code.  Penalties for failure to comply with the regulations are specified in the relevant regulations. The appendix to this Code is not intended to provide an exhaustive list of all obligations under the Act or regulatory requirements. Owners and persons in charge of animals are responsible for ensuring that they are aware of and understand all Act and regulatory requirements that are relevant to them including all applicable Codes of Welfare.

Note that the Act sets criteria for whether a procedure carried out on an animal is a significant surgical procedure. Only a veterinarian, or a person who is acting under the direct supervision of a veterinarian and who is a student undergoing his or her training to become a veterinarian, are able to perform a significant surgical procedure, unless a regulation says otherwise.

This Code of Welfare is intended for all persons responsible for the welfare of goats.

Under the Act the "owner" and every "person in charge" of an animal are responsible for meeting the legal obligations for the welfare of animals under their care.

For goats, the owner of the animals places them in the care of others who become the persons in charge, but this does not derogate from their responsibility to ensure that the requirements of the Act and animal welfare regulations are met.

'Who should read this code of Welfare?' was amended on 9 May 2021 by Notice in the Gazette 2021-go1589

Failure to meet a minimum standard in this Code may be used as evidence to support a prosecution for an offence under the Act. A person who is charged with an offence against the Act can defend him or herself by showing that he or she has equalled or exceeded the minimum standards in this Code.

This Code of Welfare includes information and example indicators for each minimum standard. The list of indicators is not exhaustive but is given to provide guidance on ways in which a minimum standard may be met.

Owners and persons in charge of animals are not required to comply with the recommendations for best practice in this Code, but are encouraged to do so to provide higher standards of welfare.

This Code does not provide an exhaustive list of the Act’s requirements, and owners and those in charge of animals should note that they must comply with the minimum standards in this Code, the general provisions of the Act, and any regulations issued under the Act.

Animal Welfare Act 1999 – NZ Legislation

'Legislative background' was amended on 9 May 2021 by Notice in the Gazette 2021-go1589

Other codes of welfare should be consulted where appropriate.

Codes of animal welfare

Codes of welfare must be accompanied by a report that sets out the deliberations that the National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC) undertook when developing the codes of welfare including the standards and recommendations for best practice, the nature of any significant differences of opinion during drafting and consultation, and any matters that should be dealt with by regulation. Code reports are available online.

Animal welfare publications, guidelines, and reports

Although efforts to include relevant regulations within this Code have been made, there may be other regulations which are relevant to you. The full list of all animal welfare regulations should be consulted where appropriate.

Animal Welfare (Care and Procedures) Regulations 2018 – NZ Legislation

1.1 Application

This Code applies to all persons responsible for the welfare of goats. This includes but is not limited to any goat that is contained for management purposes (for example, held within any boundary fence), including feral goats after mustering for the purposes of farming or slaughter, goats kept as companion animals (pets), any goat tethered anywhere and goats on game estates or safari parks.

This Code does not apply to goats defined as "wild animals" by the Wild Animal Control Act 1977.

1.2 Interpretation and definitions

Refer to Schedule 1: Interpretation and definitions

Stockmanship and animal handling cover a wide range of skills and personal qualities including having knowledge of animal needs and behaviours, an understanding of the husbandry system and the skills needed to operate within it, a rapport with the animals, an ability to observe them, and skill in the practical aspects of handling, care and manipulation of animals.

2.1 Stockmanship

Introduction

The importance of good stockmanship cannot be over-emphasised. Good stockmanship requires competence, experience and the observance of high standards of animal husbandry. Appropriate knowledge and skills (or ready access to these) are important if the animals’ health and welfare requirements are to be met. The knowledge and experience of individuals with livestock and their needs and interests, local climates and weather patterns, topography and shelter and management practices remains one of the prime means of ensuring the welfare of goats is maintained and enhanced.

Owners, managers or persons in charge are required to ensure that their personnel have both the knowledge and training or appropriate supervision so that the health and welfare needs of the goats in their care are met. Personnel should undergo training either formally or on the job by experienced supervisors. Any contract or temporary staff should be trained and competent in the relevant activity.

The owner or person in charge may place the goats in the care of others for the purpose of rearing, breeding, milking, transport or slaughter but this does not absolve them of their responsibility to ensure these tasks are carried out in accordance with this Code.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 1: Stockmanship

• Goats’ health and welfare is in accordance with this Code.
• Staff training records show that stock handlers and farm managers have completed goat husbandry training courses and/or have had training on the job from supervisors who have competence in the husbandry of the goats within the particular locale and circumstances.
• Stock handlers, owners and persons in charge of goats document how they keep up to date with developments in goat husbandry, and review their systems and practices regularly to improve the welfare of goats.
• Operational procedures are documented and accurate records are kept of the history of the goats and the treatment they have received.

Recommended best practice

Quality assurance programmes should emphasise the importance of staff training to ensure that all staff caring for goats have the knowledge and competence necessary to maintain the health and welfare of animals in their care.

General information

A number of breed and special interest groups run occasional field days providing training and information on the management of goats kept for different purposes. Details of upcoming field days can be obtained from the internet.

The New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA) also lists a number of training qualifications for stock handlers, some of which include units directly related to specific management practices for goats. These include the National Certificate in Agriculture. Information on these qualifications and accredited training providers is available through the NZQA website

2.2 Animal handling

Introduction

Goats are intelligent and inquisitive and are quick to learn new things. A quiet approach when handling goats is important. The amount of stress experienced by the goats and the risk of injury to both goats and their handlers is decreased when good handling facilities are available, as this will reduce the need to apply pressure to move the goats.

See summary of regulations appended to this Code:

• Regulation 48: Use of electric prodders
• Regulation 49: Prodding animals in sensitive areas.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 2: Animal handling

• Stock handlers’ behaviour towards goats is always patient.
• Stock handlers have knowledge of the easiest ways to move goats and do not need to resort to prodding or hitting to make goats move.
• Goats are not lifted by the horns.
• Stock handlers appreciate how goats may react to and interact with other goats, other animals, humans, strange noises, sights and smells.
• Yards and handling systems are designed with knowledge of goat behaviour to ensure that goats will readily move through facilities.
• Stock handlers are trained in the use of handling equipment.

Recommended best practice

1. Goats have a strong instinct to herd and individuals should not be unnecessarily isolated. The amount of time that individual goats are kept alone or out of sight of other goats should be minimised.
2. Stock handlers should understand and recognise stress factors for goats and take steps to minimise them.
3. Aids to facilitate handling of goats, such as vehicles, dogs, sticks and flags (when used as an extension of the arm) should all be used minimally and carefully so as not to distress or injure the goats.
4. Tails should not be lifted or twisted when moving goats.
5. If it is necessary to use dogs, they should be under control at all times and muzzled where appropriate.
6. When performing husbandry procedures on aggressive animals, they should be separated, given additional space and kept in yards for the minimum time necessary to complete the tasks.

General information

Human-animal interactions can be enhanced by improving handling procedures and facilities, selecting appropriate animals for the husbandry system, getting them used to human contact, and attending to the skill and training of the handlers.

Knowledge of goats’ flight (or safety) zone and the point of balance (the line through the animal’s shoulder which determines whether it will move forwards or backwards in the presence of a handler) will help with moving animals and in reducing fear. Animals with large flight zones, such as feral goats, become fearful and agitated when people invade this zone and when they are confined or unable to move away. The size of the flight zone depends on an animal’s genotype, its previous contact with people and whether this contact was negative or positive.

Goats that are not accustomed to yarding can become stressed, and those that feel pressured are more likely to bully their herd-mates. Goats with horns present additional risk of injury. These goats require patient handling and plenty of space.

Smothering of goats when yarding is a risk, especially when the goats are not accustomed to routine handling (e.g. feral goats). Goats are also at a particular risk of smothering when contained in groups in confined spaces, when backing boards are used, at pressure points such as gateways and yard corners, or when adults and kids are in the same mob. The risk can be minimised by quiet and patient handling, managing animals in small groups, and by appropriate yard design.

2.3 Restraint and tethering

Introduction

The facilities that are available for restraining goats on farm will depend on the farming system used but may include races, backing gates, crushes, cradles and head bails. This equipment can be used to guide a goat in a required direction or to hold it in position to enable efficient examination and treatment. Stock handlers need to be aware that head bails and crushes can cause injury to goats and people if they are not managed properly.

Goats are sometimes tethered or restrained in order to keep areas of land grazed and free of weeds. Goats tethered in this way are usually restrained by a collar or halter and chain or rope. Tethered goats have some particular requirements that must be met in order to ensure that their needs are satisfied. In addition, the food, water and shelter requirements described in Section 3: Feed and Water and Section 4.1: Shelter, apply to all goats, including tethered goats.

See summary of regulations appended to this Code:

• Regulation 16: Tethered goats must have access to food, water, and shelter.
• Regulation 47: Collars and tethers.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 3: Restraint and tethering

• Maintenance of goat restraint equipment is up-to-date and recorded, and there are no protruding parts or sharp-edged parts on the equipment that might injure goats.
• If any difficulty is encountered when restraining a goat (e.g. the goat panics, is distressed or is at risk of sustaining injury to itself), it is released quickly.
• Collar is made of leather, nylon or other pliable and durable material.
• Goats that are tethered are calm and have been trained as kids to accept approach and handling by humans, and have been trained to accept tethering after weaning, but before one year of age.
• Where a goat is on a roadside verge, the placement of the anchor and length of tether is such that the goat cannot get into the path of vehicles but the tether is of sufficient length that the goat is able to exercise and access sufficient amounts of feed.
• Sites that are to be used for tethering goats are examined beforehand for potentially harmful objects that a goat could eat such as toxic plants or litter, and for objects or vegetation that might snag or catch on the tether or collar and prevent the animal’s movement.
• Tethered goats have access to suitable shelter and are not showing signs of cold stress.
• Food and water requirements of restrained (including tethered) goats are met according to food and water minimum standards and indicators (see Section 3 Feed and Water).
• Tethered goats have the ability to walk and move around within the constraints of the tethered range.

Recommended best practice

1. Goats should be kept in herds, or at least with one social companion. If this is not possible, goats should be kept where they can see or hear other goats (or other animals).
2. Stock handlers should be trained in the safe operation and rapid release of goats from restraints and facilities.
3. Backing gates should be used carefully and should not be used in a manner likely to result in pain, injury or distress.
4. Goats should not be tethered as they are social animals.
5. Chains should not be used as a collar for goats.
6. Tripod collars or hobbles should not be used to limit a goat’s ability to move.

General information

Goats are social animals and need to be provided with one or more companions. While interaction with humans (in the case of pet goats) may provide a substitute for some of their social and behavioural needs, the welfare of goats that are tethered on their own is compromised. Providing a goat with the company of other goats is preferable, however, goats can also live with companions such as sheep, cows or horses. If it is not possible to keep a goat in a herd with social companions, providing goats with the opportunity to see or hear other goats (or other animals) can provide some welfare benefits. When tethering goats in close proximity to other tethered goats, they need to be a sufficient distance away from each other so that the tethers cannot become entangled.

When tethering goats, the use of an aerial running line, in which the chain of the tether is attached to an aerial wire or rope so that the goat can move along the line, can be beneficial and provide a goat with additional space in which to exercise and access feed.

2.4 Mustering and droving

Introduction

The mustering and droving of extensively managed or feral goats has the potential to significantly affect their welfare. The handler’s skill lies in understanding the behaviour of the animals and adapting their own behaviour (and that of any dogs) in a way that facilitates mustering while minimising stress to the animals. Mustering is best undertaken as slowly and as quietly as possible, although it is recognised that certain categories of goats, e.g. feral goats, will require more encouragement than those more familiar with human contact. Knowledge of camping (resting) areas, grazing patterns and movement routes and times will facilitate the mustering of feral goats.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 4: Mustering and droving

• Goats are calm and move steadily when mustered.
• The pace of mustering or droving is that of the slowest animals in the mob, with particular attention given to kids, goats that are pregnant and those with illness or injury.
• If any goat being mustered or driven is seen to have difficulty breathing (mouth open and tongue hanging out) then it is allowed to rest and recover.
• Goats are settled and calm when they reach the destination yard, with little bullying.
• When injuries occur while mustering, goats receive immediate care and attention.

Recommended best practice

After mustering or droving, animals should be provided with suitable conditions and time to settle down, mother up or find shelter before further handling takes place or before the onset of darkness.

General information

Goat farmers/handlers need to be aware of their responsibilities and liabilities with regard to council regulations and road rules when undertaking stock movement activities.

2.5 Mixing goats

Introduction

Goats like to live in groups in which they establish social hierarchies. Whenever animals are introduced into a herd, they will be challenged as newcomers and will have to establish their place in the group. These challenges can be aggressive and lead to injury and distress, especially where goats have horns. Such behaviour needs to be managed and this is particularly important when introducing young goats into a herd for the first time.

Bucks are potentially dangerous at all times and especially during the mating season. Bucks need to be handled with special care to ensure their own safety and that of other animals.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 5: Mixing goats

• Sufficient space is provided to enable bullied goats to move away from their aggressor.
• Goats subjected to persistent bullying are removed from the herd.
• Particular care is taken when mixing horned goats.

Recommended best practice

1. The introduction of new animals to the herd should not occur more frequently than necessary, because of the social distress involved while the introduced and resident goats re-establish a hierarchy.
2. Goats should be provided with sufficient space so that newcomers can move into free space if pushed or bunted by other animals.

General information

Goats with horns are at a distinct advantage during social challenges and can inflict serious injuries. This is more likely to happen when animals are being yarded or space is restricted. It is preferable that dairy goats are disbudded to limit the opportunity for injury from horns (for further information on disbudding see the Code of Welfare: Painful Husbandry Procedures, and the Animal Welfare (Care and Procedures) Regulations 2018. Running goats together in mobs of similar ages will also reduce the impact of social bullying on younger goats.

'General Information' was amended on 9 May 2021 by Notice in the Gazette 2021-go1589

3.1 Food

Introduction

When considering the amount of food, nutrients and water that a goat requires, a number of different factors need to be taken into account e.g. age, physiological state (growing, pregnant, lactating), and weather conditions.

Feed requirements vary throughout the year, but are generally greatest during lactation, late pregnancy, growth, during periods of excessive cold and following shearing. Pregnant does are especially vulnerable following winter shearing, as are cashmere goats with limited opportunity for hair regrowth, and may require increased feeding for up to six weeks following shearing. Nutritional requirements are best determined by monitoring body condition and liveweight.

Plants, including pasture and browse, are the main source of feed for goats in New Zealand farming systems. There is considerable variation in pastoral management systems associated with seasonal and climatic differences, land and soil types, and whether the system is extensive or intensive.

See summary of regulations appended to this Code:

• Regulation 16: Tethered goats must have access to food, water, and shelter.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 6: Food

• Goats are given sufficient daily feed to maintain appropriate body condition.
• Any goat at a body condition score less than 2 is identified and receives appropriate remedial action through improved nutrition, husbandry practice, veterinary attention, or is culled from the herd.
• Recently shorn goats are provided with additional feed.
• Staff understand and ensure that they quickly identify, seek advice on and remedy:
  • Nutritional deficiencies and metabolic diseases.
  • Conditions that might arise from faulty feeding such as poisoning, rumen acidosis or metabolic disturbance and have the resources to prevent or manage these conditions.
• Any automated feeding system supplies the correct amount of feed when tested.

Recommended best practice

1. Body condition score at kidding should be at least 3 but not obese (BCS 5), to minimise kidding and metabolic problems.
2. Goats should be maintained within the range of body condition scores 2 to 4 inclusive.
3. Female goats should be well fed to meet pregnancy requirements, and in summer and autumn to meet lactational and/or fibre growth demands and to ensure that they are in good body condition prior to winter.
4. Growing goats should be well fed in all seasons to realise their growth and future production potential.
5. When browse and pasture growth are not adequate, alternative or supplementary feed should be provided.
6. Changes in diet should be introduced gradually over several days, especially if feeding grain and/or other readily fermentable carbohydrates. This will allow rumen bacteria to adjust and thus prevent digestive problems and reduce the risk of death through grain poisoning (acidosis).
7. Feeding methods should be designed to reduce fouling and wastage.
8. Measures should be taken to minimise access of goats, and particularly pregnant does, to toxic plants and noxious or harmful materials including:
   1. most ornamental garden plants
   2. toxic weeds such as ragwort and tutu (although these may be tolerated in small quantities, meaning that goats may be used in weed control programmes provided they have choice and are not forced to consume excessive amounts
   3. lead-based paints and toxic timber preservatives
   4. electrical fittings and materials used in buildings such as plastics and papers
   5. loose fencing wire
   6. twine and plastic wrap, such as baleage wrapping.
9. When feeding brassicas and/or concentrates, a supplementary source of roughage such as hay, barley straw, silage or baleage should be added to the diet to aid proper digestion.
10. Goats maintained for long periods of time on diets containing a high proportion of grain should receive appropriate dietary supplementation to ensure they maintain levels of essential vitamins and minerals.
11. Supplementary feeds should be conserved and stored in a way that feed quality is preserved, mould-growth is inhibited and contamination by rodents, birds and cats is prevented.
12. Mould-contaminated or excessively dusty supplementary feeds should not be fed to goats.
13. Animals in ill-health, poor condition, late pregnancy or early lactation should not be deprived of food for longer than 12 hours.

General information

Regular body condition scoring is an important management tool. Body condition scoring is a useful method of assessment to determine whether animals are receiving adequate nutrition (Schedule II: Body condition scoring (BCS)). Hair and fleece may hide body contours, especially in fibre goats, so goats must be handled and the bony points of the ribs, backbone and pelvis palpated for accurate assessment of body condition.

Where animals are housed or fed supplements, herd hierarchy and bullying can limit access of individual goats to feed. This can be dealt with by appropriate design and management (e.g. by segregating animals or providing extra feeder space). Human intervention may be required to ensure all goats have access to feed.

Goats can gain significant condition (1.0 - 1.5 points) on spring and early summer grass and so individuals with access to large amounts of grazing at this time need to be monitored to ensure they do not become obese. Pregnant does may lose body condition during late pregnancy and early lactation and so care needs to be taken to ensure that they are receiving adequate nutrition at this time.

Goats have a high requirement for minerals, especially selenium and iodine.

Goats may be reluctant to leave shelter for extended periods during wet weather so it may be necessary to provide additional supplement feed that the goats can obtain without leaving their shelter. Goats will also not eat muddy or contaminated feed or pasture, and so care needs to be taken to ensure that the available feed is clean.

Many feedstuffs can constitute a danger to animal health. Goats prefer to browse and this may reduce their internal parasite burden, but they will readily eat many toxic plants. Stock handlers need to be aware of the possible dangers such as frothy bloat, nitrate poisoning, effects of toxic plants (including garden prunings), rumen acidosis, choke and the effects of fungal or bacterial contamination of feed.

3.2 Water

Introduction

The provision of an adequate supply of water is critical for maintaining goat health and welfare.

Water needs for different classes of goats vary widely, and there is seasonal variation as well. If water needs are not met then animal health and welfare both deteriorate.

See summary of regulations appended to this Code:

• Regulation 16: Tethered goats must have access to food, water and shelter.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 7: Water

• Goats are provided with sufficient water.
• Water quality is monitored and does not contain any contaminants at a level harmful to the health of goats.
• The water reticulation system provides a sufficient volume of water to meet the daily needs of the goats, is monitored and maintained efficiently, and any failure is rectified immediately.
• Yards and barns where goats are retained for periods of 12 hours or longer have an adequate water supply to meet the goat’s requirements.
• The height of troughs and drinkers ensure that goats do not suffer any injuries or distress, and the smallest goat in any herd can reach the water supply.

Recommended best practice

1. Watering facilities should be designed to reduce fouling and wastage.
2. Troughs should be cleaned regularly and often to ensure that water is available and uncontaminated.
3. Goats held in yards and barns for longer than six hours should have access to drinking water.

General information

Water and shade needs increase when goats are grazing dry summer pastures and during drought, especially for young and light-weight goats.

Appropriate water allowance varies with animal size, diet and lactational state. When planning water for dairy goats, ensure that the reticulation system can provide nine litres/head/day. Goats drink less water than sheep when shade is provided, but in the absence of shade they will drink more.

Young goats and kids will often mistakenly jump into troughs during play. Deep troughs may be covered to prevent such accidents. Concrete blocks or bricks can be placed in the trough to enable any goat that falls in to escape.

4.1 Shelter

Introduction

Goats do not possess the ability to withstand cold conditions to the same extent as other species of livestock due to a different distribution of fat and consistency of their coat. Goat farmers in New Zealand therefore need to be aware of the animal welfare implications of inadequate shelter, and develop management plans to provide shelter in adverse weather and after shearing to prevent heat and cold stress.

New Zealand pastoral systems may be exposed to the effects of the weather: heat, cold, rain, snow, and wind. While goats are resilient to cold temperatures when conditions are dry, occasions arise when weather extremes can cause stress and goats are particularly prone to hypothermia when conditions are wet. Shelter can also be important when environmental conditions are not extreme.

Goats seek shelter for kidding and to hide their young, and a goat that is ill may separate itself from its group to seek protection in a sheltered area.

Signs of cold and heat exposure in goats

Early signs of significant cold exposure in goats include behavioural changes such as seeking shelter, facing away from the wind or rain with the back hunched, heads down, not eating, shivering, and huddling together. Where animals are exposed to cold conditions with which they cannot cope, their core body temperature drops below the normal range (hypothermia). As hypothermia progresses, animals become depressed and listless and may die. Such depression and listlessness indicates the need for urgent remedial action.

When goats are exposed to conditions that cause heat stress, they will try to find relief in a number of ways. These include increased respiration rate, reduced grazing activity, seeking shade, and increased water consumption. If the heat load continues to rise, animals will progress to open mouth panting with tongues extended when severe. Fibre goats in heavy fleece are more susceptible to heat exposure.

Effective shelter at stock level may be provided in a number of ways including the use of topographical features such as caves and overhangs, gullies or hollows of adequate depth, natural features such as stands of trees or scrub, hedges, shelter belts or thickets of plants like pampas and gorse. Alternatively, artificial structures such as field shelters, buildings or hay stacks can be used. Shelter needs to have the effect of providing goats with the ability to stay dry, to get off wet ground and to get out of the wind.

Management plans for dealing with stressful climatic events include ensuring that goats are in good physical condition to withstand periods of stress and by providing additional feed of appropriate type, e.g. increased roughage to help generate rumen heat and relieve cold stress.

Special attention is needed for:

• newborn kids
• newly-shorn goats – especially cashmere-bearing goats
• does close to kidding and at kidding
• lactating does
• animals in ill-health or stressed from other causes
• goats in areas subject to extreme weather.

See summary of regulations appended to this Code:

• Regulation 16: Tethered goats must have access to food, water, and shelter.

4.2 Farm facilities

Introduction

Farm facilities include fences, gates, holding pens, internal yards, and additional areas such as a milking parlour or shearing facility, depending upon the nature of the goat production system. The proper construction, maintenance and operation of farm facilities are important to facilitate management and provide a safe and hygienic environment for procedures such as milking and shearing. Careful planning and design will assist movement of animals and minimise stress of both animals and handlers.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 9: Farm facilities

• The design and construction of facilities encourages the free movement of goats, enables them to walk comfortably, and prevents injury, crowding or smothering.
• Stock handlers are trained and familiar with the operation of farm facilities and understand how incorrect operation may affect the goats in their care.
• Floor surfaces are not slippery.
• The farm maintenance programme ensures that problems such as damaged flooring, protrusions and sharp objects are removed or repaired in a timely manner.
• Where injuries related to facilities occur, the reason is determined and the problem rectified.
• There are no toxic health remedies, toxic materials, power cables or fittings in areas to which goats have access
• If sheep and cattle facilities are used, they are adapted to suit goats.

Recommended best practice

1. Loading ramps should be constructed with non-slip footing and have side-boards or rails to prevent animals falling off or getting their legs trapped.
2. Netting fences that allow goats with horns to become trapped should not be used.
3. Excrement should not be permitted to accumulate to an extent that it poses a threat to the health and welfare of goats.
4. Toxic paint and timber preservatives should not be used on surfaces or floors that are accessible to goats.
5. Any mechanical equipment used in the handling and management of goats should be maintained in sound working order.
6. Goat shearing facilities should be designed, constructed, maintained and located in a way that ensures shearing can be conducted in an environment that maximises safety and minimises stress for the animals, shearers and staff.

General information

Information on the construction and maintenance of farm facilities for goat milk production is available in the Farm Dairy Code of Practice (NZCP1) and the Approved Criteria for Farm Dairies (DPC2), available on the MPI website.

4.3 Housing for goats

Introduction

In New Zealand, many dairy goats are housed full-time in barns and pasture can be "cut and carried" to the animals. While barns provide shelter from inclement weather, the main reason for this practice is to control internal parasites. In these situations animals are totally dependent on their handlers for all their daily requirements, welfare and safety, and farmers need to be aware there are additional responsibilities of care.

The well-being of the animals needs to be a key consideration when goat housing systems are designed and constructed. Does and kids require accommodation that is dry, well ventilated and draught-free. The optimal space allowances for housed animals vary depending on whether goats receive some or all of their feed supply in the housing area. The important factor is to allow enough area per goat to ensure that they all have the opportunity for adequate rest.

Goats prefer to lie on soft surfaces and are reluctant to lie down when the surface is slippery or wet.

If the surface type and area per goat are not adequate there will be reduced lying times, underfeeding and an increased incidence of disease.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 10: Housing for goats

• Goats are all able to lie down and rest simultaneously.
• At least 2 m2 of space is provided per individual mature housed goat.
• Bedding materials are dry and comfortable for goats to lie on.
• Humidity, dust, temperature or ammonia (as detected by smell) are kept within acceptable levels.
• Immediate corrective action is taken where ammonia levels are 25 ppm or greater (by increasing ventilation, reducing litter moisture or reducing stocking density) and instances where this has occurred are documented.
• Waste food and contaminated bedding material does not accumulate to an extent that it poses a threat to the health and welfare of the animals (e.g. wet, mouldy or noxious).
• Where thermal stress occurs it is immediately remedied.
• Goats do not show signs of excessive bullying such as bite marks on ears and hocks, bare skin patches or ill-thrift.
• Group composition and size is organised to avoid excessive bullying.
• Inspections of goats show minimal signs of discomfort, distress or disease (e.g. sneezing, coughing, heavy breathing, runny noses or eyes).
• When goats that have been housed indoors for long periods of time are released, they are provided with shelter in weather conditions that are likely to result in heat stress, cold stress or sunburn.
• Contingency plans are in place for dealing with any hazards or emergencies and incorporate the ability to rapidly release goats into a secure environment.

Recommended best practice

1. 1. Emergency response plans should be in place for potential hazards, and all stock handlers should be aware of these plans and the routines required to ensure the safety and welfare of goats and handlers in an emergency, e.g. evacuation plans.
   2. Feeding and watering systems should be constructed to be readily accessible, prevent competition and take into account the feed, stock type and size of the enclosure.
   3. The bedding area should be dry and covered with material to provide a comfortable resting surface.
   4. A minimum space allowance of 3 m2 per mature goat should be provided to reduce the chance that underfoot conditions become wet.
   5. Ammonia levels should not exceed levels of 10 ppm at ground level.
   6. During inspection periods, natural or artificial light of at least 50 lux should be available at the level of resting goats in loafing barns and houses.
   7. A feeding space/trough width of 40 cm per adult goat should be allowed when all goats need access to feed. If food is continually available then space may be less.
   8. A separate pen should be provided to hold and treat unwell or injured goats until recovery, or to house goats that persistently bully other goats or are persistently bullied by other goats.
   9. Environmental enrichment should be used by making ‘toys’ available such as boxes or rocks on which the goats can climb, or by providing positive human contact or a radio to accustom goats to a range of noises and voices.
   10. Goats that are unfamiliar to each other should be monitored when mixed, to ensure that fighting is kept to a minimum.

General information

As a guide, a level of 10 – 15 ppm of ammonia in the air can be detected by smell and an ammonia level over 25 ppm may cause eye and nasal irritation in people. In general, if the level of noxious gases within a housing facility is uncomfortable for people, it will be uncomfortable for goats. Such levels compromise animal welfare and may predispose goats to respiratory disease and reduced performance.

The material used as bedding, or on surfaces and flooring, for goats needs to be chosen with the aim of minimising the presence of toxic chemicals that could be poisonous to goats (e.g. timber preservatives, some paint) or materials that could cause irritation of the skin (e.g. rimu sawdust).

As a guide, 50 lux is sufficient light to read a newspaper at arm’s length.

Signs of bullying include bite marks on ears and hocks, bare skin patches and ill-thrift. These are also an indication that goats do not have good access to feed. Excessively bullied goats will tend to remain outside of the main group.

Care is required where hand-reared kids are group housed as they often crowd together, which can result in smothering of the kids. To help prevent this, corners need to be screened from the pen and if providing an external source of heat, e.g. a heat lamp, measures need to be taken to ensure that kids cannot crowd below the heat source.

5.1 Kidding Does

Introduction

Kidding is a critical period for the welfare of both doe and kid. Potential compromises to animal welfare at this time are diverse and include feeding levels during pregnancy, disturbance from other animals and humans, predisposition to dystocia (difficulties during birthing), the weather and available shelter. The appropriate level of supervision will differ depending whether does are intensively or extensively managed. 

Domestication of the goat has meant that stock handlers have to balance the natural tendencies of goats to give birth undisturbed and often in isolation, with any requirements to assist with difficult births. The requirements of does during kidding may also vary between breeds with some breeds being more likely to exhibit problems during kidding than others. Disturbing or providing assistance to does that are farmed extensively or with minimal intervention may lead to the doe deserting the offspring. 

Nutrition around the kidding period is especially important (see Section 3 Feed and Water). Trace element and mineral status need to be considered, as well as feed quality and quantity.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 11: Kidding does

• Mortality rates (kids and does) are documented and minimised.
• Sufficient staff with appropriate training are available to inspect animals around the time of kidding.
• Farm routines show that inspections occur at least twice every 24 hours in intensive farming situations, that inspection results are analysed and necessary changes are incorporated into future planning.
• Stock handlers have knowledge of kidding problems and how to correct them and have appropriate equipment to assist kidding does.
• Stock handlers have knowledge of how to access expert advice, and such advice is available and is sought when required.

Recommended best practice

1. Where animals are unaccustomed to daily supervision such as in extensive systems, breeds or strains suited to easy births. and good maternal care should be used. In more intensive systems, where animals are habituated to the presence of humans and management activities, assistance should be provided to animals experiencing difficulties without unduly disturbing others giving birth in the vicinity.
2. Easy-kidding sires should be selected for goatling mating as large kids can cause significant injuries to small does.
3. Goats close to kidding should be inspected frequently; preferably at least every 6 hours.
4. Kidding paddocks should provide dry ground, shelter and protection from adverse weather.
5. Does that have been trying to kid for more than 1 hour without progress should be given assistance or veterinary help (kidding in this context means vigorous abdominal straining).
6. To minimise the potential for damage to either doe or kid, controlled traction should only be used if the operator has diagnosed an unrestricted birth canal and the kid is in the normal position for delivery and should be conducted with plenty of lubrication. The amount of traction used should be no more than a single person can apply.

General information

The important features to be taken into consideration when deciding to assist a doe to kid are:

• an assessment of the size and number of kids, and whether they are alive and in the correct orientation for delivery;
• an assessment of doe health and condition; and
• the amount and direction of traction, which alters as the kid enters and passes through the pelvic canal.

5.2 Hand rearing and fostering kids

Introduction

Newborn and young animals are particularly vulnerable to negative welfare outcomes resulting from adverse environmental conditions and poor management. Consequently, all kids require special attention to ensure they are healthy and to allow their individual needs to be assessed.

In dairying systems, kids are removed from their mothers at a young age. Consideration of the health of the doe, the effects of early weaning on her welfare and the need to be milked regularly are referred to in Section 5.3 Lactating Does and Milking Systems.

Good management of young kids is essential for their welfare. Some are destined to only live a few days before they are killed, but that does not remove the obligation to manage them to the same standard as every other animal on the farm.

Kids from meat or fibre goats that are rejected by their mothers or orphaned may be fostered onto nurse does, hand fed or humanely destroyed.

Colostrum is the first milk produced by the doe after kidding and contains special nutrients and antibodies that are essential to protect the kid from disease. The newborn kid absorbs antibodies from colostrum, but begins to lose this ability from about six hours after birth. In addition, the concentration of antibodies in the colostrum diminishes rapidly after the doe has kidded and is reduced markedly after two milkings. 

A new born kid does not have a functional rumen, and therefore needs to be given liquid feeds until the rumen has developed sufficiently to allow it to utilise solids as its sole source of nutrition.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 12: Hand rearing and fostering kids

• Planning for kidding includes ensuring that stocks of colostrum or a suitable substitute are on hand to supplement kids if necessary.
• Stock handlers’ behaviour towards kids is patient.
• Stock handlers understand the importance of colostrum and are trained to provide it when a kid has not received it in sufficient amounts, e.g. by stomach tube.
• Farm staff are trained in the humane destruction of kids.
• Stock handlers are trained to recognise if a kid is not receiving adequate feed and remedy the situation.
• Kid-rearing programmes provide kids with their specific nutritional needs as a preruminant.
• Kids are not weaned until they are receiving at least 75% of their daily feed requirements from solid feed.

Recommended best practice

1. Every kid should receive colostrum as soon as possible after birth, preferably within the first six hours. If it is suspected that a kid has not received colostrum, then colostrum or a suitable substitute should be given to the kid within 24 hours of birth.
2. Colostrum, milk or milk replacer should be fed at the rate of 10-12% of bodyweight per day, preferably in four or more feeds per day.
3. Kids should not be weaned until they are at least six weeks old, and preferably not until they are 8-10 weeks of age.
4. Any technique used to foster a kid onto a doe should not compromise the welfare of either doe or kid, should cause minimal stress to both the doe and the kid, and should be closely supervised.
5. When two or more kids are fostered onto a nurse doe they should be of a similar size and age.
6. Nurse does with kids at foot should be inspected at least once every 24 hours to ensure that both does and kids are in good health.
7. During the first 48 hours of life, liquid feeds should be warm, but not above the kid’s normal body temperature (39oC).
8. Colostrum should not be overheated or micro-waved as this will destroy antibodies.
9. Kids should also have access to solid feeds (appropriate concentrates, hay, silage or pasture) from their first week of life. Consumption of these solids will enhance rumen development and will contribute increasingly to satisfying the kid's nutrient requirements.
10. Kids should have adequate access to fresh water.

General information

Colostrum, either fresh or stored, can provide local immunity in the gut and is a highly digestible, high quality food. Note that antibodies cannot be absorbed by the kid beyond 24–36 hours after birth and so colostrum needs to be fed as soon as possible after birth.

Cow colostrum, ewe colostrum, or commercial dried whole colostrum may be used if goat colostrum is unavailable or where a disease management programme is in place. Doe vaccination programmes, e.g. clostridial vaccines to boost the level of antibodies in colostrum, may be considered. These practices can be discussed with a veterinarian.

Hygienic practices are required for the maintenance of feeding equipment, bedding material and toileting areas to keep kids healthy. When kids are fed in groups, care is needed to ensure that all kids, even the slowest drinkers, are consuming what they need.

5.3 Lactating does and milking systems

Introduction

In dairying systems, efficient milking is essential for the good health, welfare and productivity of the doe. The modern dairy goat may produce more milk than its kids can consume and needs to be milked regularly for good udder health; farmers traditionally milk goats twice a day.

The milking process needs to be carried out calmly and with regular routines to create a stress-free environment for the doe. This will ensure that complete milk let-down occurs in the doe before or during milking. Gathering goats from the paddock or housing facility, driving along the race, holding them in the yard, and entering and exiting from the milking bail are all part of this process.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 13: Milking

• Any goat with an over-extended udder or other signs of discomfort (e.g. restlessness, heat or pain on palpation) is examined immediately, the cause determined and remedial action taken.
• Upon inspection of teats and udders, minimal damage from milking equipment is observed.
• Stock handlers have knowledge of udder health and have procedures in place to recognise and treat problems.
• Records show that the milking plant has passed its routine inspection and audit.

Recommended best practice

1. Regular routines for milking should be established, in order to minimise or avoid distress.
2. Does in dairying systems should be milked within 12 hours of separation from their kids.
3. All lactating does, including those being sold or exhibited, should be milked or suckle kids at least once every 24 hours unless good management practices dictate otherwise.
4. To minimise the risk of discomfort or damage to the teats, the partial vacuum in the milking machine should not be higher than 40 kPa and the teat-cup liners and the pulsation system should function properly.
5. Care should be taken to avoid over-milking.
6. Milking machines should be tested at least once a year and more frequently if the milking process is compromised, as indicated by milking speed, teat damage and/or doe behaviour. All faults should be corrected immediately.
7. The risk of teat and udder infections should be minimised by practising good hygiene.
8. The teat condition of does in dairying systems should be monitored and an appropriate remedy used if condition deteriorates.
9. Goatlings that are to be managed in dairying systems should be familiarised with the milking facility prior to kidding.
10. Where there is a risk of an extended failure of the electricity supply, provision should be made for an independent generator to operate the milking machine and ancillary equipment.

General information

Milk removal, conducted in good environmental conditions and with an efficient milking machine, is complete after about 6-8 minutes for most does, depending on milk yield and rate of milk flow. Signs of discomfort (kicking the cups off and/or constant movement by the doe while milking) and/or an increased incidence of sores on the teats can indicate faults in the vacuum level or pulsation system, or the presence of stray electrical voltages (electrical shorts) in the farm dairy. 

Signs of poor teat condition include redness and chapping. This is more likely to occur during wet and windy weather. 

5.4 Drying-off dairy does

Introduction

To prepare for their next kidding, does in dairying systems generally go through a drying-off process to end their lactation. Individual animals may be dried-off earlier for other farm management reasons (e.g. feed shortages). The aim is to shut down milk secretion and allow the teat canal to seal as rapidly as possible. While a short period of reduced food intake may assist with this process, the requirements of Section 3 Food and Water need to be met.

Recommended best practice

1. The drying-off process should be done in a manner that minimises discomfort.
2. For at least three weeks after dry-off, does should be monitored weekly for signs of udder pain or swelling.
3. Dairy does that are being dried off should be kept in a clean area to minimise the risk of udder infection.

General information

Does may be milked less frequently before drying off to assist with discomfort at drying off. Although lower feeding levels seem to reduce discomfort after dry-off, does fed less are likely to experience hunger. Investigation of alternative dry-off procedures, such as feeding low-quality diets ad libitum, is recommended as these methods can maximise the benefits of lower milk yields before dry-off, without causing hunger.

5.5 Shearing and dagging fibre goats

Introduction

Shearing is an important part of fibre goat farming and goats need to be handled carefully during the procedure and managed well afterwards to prevent hypothermia. The timing of shearing needs to be carefully considered, heed taken of warnings of approaching storms or inclement weather, and planning needs to include provision of shelter from unexpected storms.  The most appropriate type of shelter varies between farms and may be natural or artificial.

The appropriate frequency of shearing varies according to the type of goat, with Angora goats (mohair-producing) generally shorn every six months. For Angora goats, separate parts of the fleece may also be removed to promote their welfare. Dag removal from around the breech helps reduce the risk of flystrike as well as reducing discomfort and inflammation of the underlying skin. Fibre growing from the face may be removed to prevent vision being obscured, and from the belly to facilitate suckling. When shearing Cashmere goats, "patch shearing" can be used. This technique involves shearing only the areas which are growing harvestable cashmere, thus helping to prevent hypothermia.

Cashmere goats require special consideration at shearing time for several reasons. They are generally only shorn during the winter or early spring when weather conditions are cool and may be stormy. Their fibre production is seasonal and they may have very little regrowth, and their increased feed and shelter requirements following shearing may persist for many weeks to prevent the occurrence of hypothermia. Cashmere goats are often kept in extensive situations with little regular contact with humans so mustering and penning for shearing add to the stress they experience at shearing. Goats may also experience additional stress if shorn with a full rumen so a short time off feed prior to shearing will be beneficial in this case.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 14: Shearing and dagging fibre goats

• Planning for shearing includes careful consideration of weather forecasts, provision of shelter and adequate feed, including making food and water available for animals immediately after shearing.
• No fibre goat has an excessively long coat that is either soiled, impedes the goat’s movement, or causes skin or other disease, especially in hot weather conditions.
• Shearing is timed to coincide with forecast of good weather. Where weather forecasts are for cold or wet conditions, shearing does not proceed unless adequate shelter is provided. In winter and when there is risk of hypothermia, an insulating layer of fibre remains after shearing.

Recommended best practice

1. Shearing and dagging should be carried out skilfully and carefully by competent operators to ensure that shearing cuts, especially those to the teats, vulva and prepuce are kept to a minimum.
2. Angora goats should be shorn at least every eight months.
3. Freshly shorn goats should not be put into dusty yards for longer than necessary to reduce risk of infection in shearing cuts.

General information

Newly shorn fibre goats are especially vulnerable to adverse weather conditions and require more feed than normal for six weeks after shearing to sustain body temperature and to maintain body condition and immune function. In addition to using patch shearing to help prevent hypothermia in Cashmere goats, there are also major benefits from using combs that retain some of the coat. Goats with a residual coat length of 4 mm need additional feed to maintain body warmth at ambient temperatures below 15°C, whereas an 8 mm coat means that additional feed will be required below 11°C.

5.6 Reproductive technologies and selection of animals for mating introduction

Introduction

Breeding management techniques and programmes that optimise genetic potential have been adopted in all sectors of the goat industry in New Zealand. In addition to selecting animals with desirable genotypes for breeding, there are a number of established and developing technologies being used to facilitate genetic gains and better manage animals. 

Minimum Standard No. 15 replaced on 9 May 2021 by regulation 25(2) of the Animal Welfare (Care and Procedures) Amendment Regulations 2020

Note: deleted on 9 May 2021 by Notice in the Gazette 2021-go1589

Recommended best practice

1. Less invasive procedures (e.g. semen collection using an artificial vagina) should be used in preference to more invasive ones (e.g. semen collection by electro-ejaculation).
2. Any procedure used to alter the pattern of seasonal breeding, or to increase litter size, should only be used where the extra requirements to ensure good welfare (feed, farm labour, shelter and other inputs required before and after the animal gives birth) have been thoroughly assessed and can be provided.
3. When selecting goats for breeding, attention should be given to selecting animals of appropriate physical size (both buck and doe), kidding experience and previous management history to match the system in which they will be farmed (i.e. previously kept extensively or intensively).

General information

Multiple births are common with goats, especially the dairy breeds where three or four kids per pregnancy are common. Does carrying multiple pregnancies require more feed during the latter stages of pregnancy. Gestation length may be shorter and there may be more malpresentations or difficult births, and bonding between doe and offspring. These factors mean increased supervision is necessary when multiple births occur to ensure new born animals survive and receive colostrum.

5.7 Painful husbandry procedures

Introduction

Farming goats involves a number of husbandry procedures such as disbudding, castration and occasionally dehorning which have been identified as causing pain and distress.

Minimising the stress, pain or discomfort of these procedures requires attention to the suitability of the area in which the operation is performed, the catching facilities, the type and amount of restraint, the selection and maintenance of appropriate instruments, good hygiene, the subsequent care of the animals and the skill of the stock handlers carrying out the procedures. 

These procedures are covered in a separate code of Welfare and readers are directed to the Code of Welfare: Painful Husbandry Procedures for information and requirements.   Additionally, a number of these procedures can be considered Significant Surgical Procedures. The Animal Welfare Act 1999 sets criteria for whether a procedure carried out on an animal is a significant surgical procedure. The criteria are set out in Section 16 of the Act.

If any person has to determine whether a procedure carried out on an animal is a significant surgical procedure under this Act, the person must determine the question by considering the following criteria:

1. whether the procedure has the potential to—
   1. cause significant pain or distress; or
   2. cause serious or lasting harm, or loss of function, if not carried out by a veterinarian in accordance with recognised professional standards; and
2. the nature of the procedure, including whether this involves—
   1. a surgical or operative procedure below the surface of the skin, mucous membranes, or teeth or below the gingival margin; or
   2. physical interference with sensitive soft tissue or bone structure; or
   3. significant loss of tissue or loss of significant tissue.

Only a veterinarian, or a person who is acting under the direct supervision of a veterinarian and who is a student undergoing his or her training to become a veterinarian, are able to perform a significant surgical procedure, unless a regulation says otherwise. 

For all animal welfare regulations please see www.legislation.govt.nz. Note that not all of the surgical procedures included within these regulations meet the criteria of a significant surgical procedure, some have been regulated for clarity only.

See also the summary of regulations appended to this Code:

• Regulation 55A: Castrating goats
• Regulation 55D: Vaginal prolapse in goats
• Regulation 55G: Removing goats’ teats
• Regulation 55L: Prohibition on hot branding of animals generally
• Regulation 55M: Hot branding of horses, ponies, and donkeys
• Regulation 56D: Cutting teeth of animals
• Regulation 57B: Disbudding goats
• Regulation 58A: Dehorning goats
• Regulation 59A: Surgical reproductive procedures
• Regulation 59B: Transcervical Insemination
• Regulation 59C: Cystocentesis
• Regulation 59E: Epidurals
• Regulation 59F: Urinary catheterisation

Introduction amended on 9 May 2021 by Notice in the Gazette 2021-go1589

Recommended best practice

1. Pain relief should be provided when performing any painful husbandry procedure and must be provided where specified in the Animal Welfare (Care and Procedures) Regulations 2018.
2. Male goats that are castrated before puberty should be monitored for joint abnormalities and arthritis as they age as, in some cases, they can experience abnormal continued growth of the long bones causing their legs to become distorted.

Recommended Best Practice amended on 9 May 2021 by Notice in the Gazette 2021-go1589

General information

The skull of a goat kid is much thinner than that of a calf. Thermal cautery disbudding techniques need to be carried out carefully to avoid damaging the underlying tissues, including the brain.

5.8 Animal identification

Introduction

Ear tags are commonly used to identify individual goats. Permanent identification such as ear notching, marking, tattooing, and freeze branding may also be used. These procedures cause pain and the general principles outlined in the Code of Welfare: Painful Husbandry Procedures apply.

See also, the summary of regulations appended to this Code:

• Regulation 55L: Prohibition on hot branding of animals generally.

Introduction amended on 9 May 2021 by Notice in the Gazette 2021-go1589

Minimum Standard 16 amended on 9 May 2021 by regulation 25(2) of the Animal Welfare (Care and Procedures) Amendment Regulations 2020

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 16: Identification

• No ear injuries or infections are apparent.

Recommended best practice

1. Goats should not be freeze branded.
2. Permanent tags should be inserted using the applicators designed for the purpose and according to the manufacturer’s specifications and with good hygiene.
3. Goats’ ears are very sensitive and care should be taken when inserting ear tags to avoid hitting cartilage ridges or major blood vessels.
4. Any infection resulting from tag application should be treated promptly.
5. The size and number of tags required should be kept to a minimum.
6. Where tattooing is used, it should be carried out by a competent operator.
7. The use of ear punches for identification purposes should be restricted to those situations where tagging is not feasible. As little as possible and no more than 10% of ear tissue should be removed using an instrument that is clean and sharp.
8. When goats are vaccinated for Johne’s disease they are required to have an ear notched, and this should be done using the appropriate triangular ear punch tool according to the manufacturer’s instructions and with good hygiene.

Recommended Best Practice amended on 9 May 2021 by Notice in the Gazette 2021-go1589

General information

Permanent identification of individual goats is required by various legislation and laws; goat industry organisations can provide further information.

Neck bands may be useful for temporary identification of young kids but their use requires supervision to prevent entanglement.

5.9 Pre-transport selection

Introduction

When selecting animals for transport, other industry standards and/or codes for transport need to be considered. Requirements for transport beyond the farm gate are described in the Code of Welfare: Transport within New Zealand and conditions for slaughter are described in the Code of Welfare: Commercial Slaughter. 

In cases of doubt about the condition of an animal, a veterinarian needs to be consulted. A veterinarian can certify an animal as fit for transport, in which case the appropriate documentation must accompany the animal on its journey.

Transporting goats can cause them significant stress. This is particularly the case for feral goats and goats that are not used to human contact. The presence of horned goats in the group will also exacerbate stress. Good stockmanship is essential to minimise anxiety and distress during transportation.

See summary of regulations appended to this Code:

• Regulation 30: Prevention of injury
• Regulation 31: Transport of animals with horns and antlers
• Regulation 32: Prevention of back-rub
• Regulation 38: Restrictions on transporting animals with ingrown horns
• Regulation 39: Restrictions on transporting animals with injured horns or antlers
• Regulation 40: Restrictions on transporting lame animals
• Regulation 41: Restrictions on transporting animals in late pregnancy
• Regulation 42: Restrictions on transporting animals with injured or diseased udders
• Regulation 43: Restrictions on transporting animals with eye cancer

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 17: Pre-transport selection

• All goats transported are fit and healthy and can support their weight on all four limbs.
• Unweaned kids to be transported off the farm are given a feed no more than two hours before they are loaded.
• No goat gives birth during transport.

Recommended best practice 

1. The design of holding facilities at loading areas should offer adequate shelter and comfort for all goats, easy access for the stock handler and transport operator, and facilitate efficient handling of the animals.
2. In the absence of ramps, when goats have to be lifted onto a transporter, their whole body should be supported in the lift.
3. Pregnant goats should not be selected for transport in the last three weeks before the expected date of kidding.
4. Goats should not be mustered for long distances the day before transport.
5. Every effort should be made to ensure kids and cull goats are transported for the shortest possible time.
6. Goats that will not be acceptable to the processing plant should not be loaded for transport.
7. During preparation for transport, prolonged deprivation of food and water should be avoided. Yearling and adult goats should be held off green-feed for a minimum of four to six hours before transportation but for no more than 12 hours. Clean water should be available during this time.
8. When undertaking long journeys, goats should be nutritionally prepared beforehand by supplying them with the type of feed that they will receive at rest stops during the journey and upon its completion.
9. Dogs should be under control at all times and should not be used to move young kids.

General information

The preparation of mature animals for transport, especially pregnant does, will depend on the method, the distance and the time involved. In particular the suitability of the truck for transport should be considered – some sheep trucks are not appropriate for dairy does. For guidelines on preparation for long-haul journeys, a veterinarian or suitably experienced transport operator should be consulted.  

Providing sheds and holding facilities that are darkened and minimise noise will assist in settling goats being held for transport.

Introduction

Owners and persons in charge of goats have an obligation to ensure that the health needs of their animals are met. Stock handlers need to be familiar with the more common health problems of goats and observe their stock frequently and carefully for early signs of disease. Any potential problems need to be noted as early as possible and steps taken to rectify the problem.

See summary of regulations appended to this Code:

• Regulation 17: Goats with ingrown horns.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 18: Health

• Stock handlers are trained and competent to recognise ill-health and injury and to undertake prompt action and treatment as necessary.
• All sick or injured goats are treated immediately by a competent stock handler or destroyed humanely.
• There is a documented herd health plan that includes prophylactic treatments such as vaccination schedules and parasite management.
• Animal health records show that all animal remedies have been used appropriately.
• A veterinarian is consulted when a significant animal health problem persists.

Recommended best practice

1. Goats should be inspected as frequently as necessary to detect any problem at an early stage.
2. Stock handlers should be familiar with the more common health problems of goats and observe their stock carefully for early signs of disease including pain, discomfort and weight loss. They should take early action to prevent worsening of any condition, and organise prompt expert attention should this occur.
3. If appropriate, goats showing signs of ill-health should be separated from herd-mates to prevent bullying and to facilitate treatment.
4. Any goat that is unable to stand should receive veterinary attention within 48 hours of becoming recumbent or be destroyed humanely. These recumbent goats should be inspected frequently, kept in an upright position (i.e. lying on their sternum with legs tucked under the body) on a soft dry surface, and shifted from side to side as often as possible.
5. On commercial farms, animal health records should be kept, including details and timing of parasite control measures, foot care procedures, appropriate vaccinations, supplementation of nutrients that are deficient in the diet, culling strategies and cross-grazing with other species as appropriate.
6. Goats should be given regular and effective treatments to prevent internal and external parasite burdens, as recommended by veterinarians or product manufacturers.
7. Animal remedies should only be used in accordance with registration conditions, manufacturer’s instructions and/or professional advice.
8. Goats should be managed with the aim of minimising the incidence of lameness.
9. All staff should be trained in the prevention, identification and treatment of lameness and where it is observed, the affected foot is carefully examined and treated immediately.
10. Veterinary advice should be sought when there is:
    1. persistent ill-thrift, lameness, pain or poor performance that does not respond to treatment
    2. concern about the welfare of the animal.

General information 

Diseases that can be particularly problematic for the goat farmer include gastro-intestinal parasitism, Johne’s disease, outbreaks of pneumonia, scabby mouth (orf), periodontal disease, CLA (caseous lymphadenitis) and CAE (caprine arthritis-encephalitis). When these diseases are suspected, an expert should be consulted to confirm the diagnosis and to advise on appropriate disease control measures to be included in the animal health programme. Organic production systems may present special challenges to goat health and welfare and require particular attention to management and disease prevention strategies to avoid health and welfare compromise. 

Parasitic diseases

Farmed goats are relatively susceptible to worms and, unlike sheep and cattle, do not develop agerelated resistance to worms. Management systems therefore need to be structured to combat internal parasites throughout the life of the goat. Drench resistance has developed in some worm species and this can limit the treatment options available to the goat farmer. 

There are a greater number of options for worm control in fibre producing goats as with-holding times on anthelmintics (meaning that milk and meat from treated goats cannot be sold within that period) can limit the available options for dairy and meat goats. Long-acting drugs can, however, be useful in fibre goats where residues are of minimal importance. 

Goats are known to metabolise anthelmintics faster than sheep and so dose recommendations need to be tailored specifically for goats. 

Diseases of the hoof

Lameness is a painful condition and warrants immediate and effective treatment. Hoof growth is rapid in goats and if the environment (including housing) does not allow the hoof to wear away naturally, then routine trimming may be required to prevent the horn from curling underneath the foot.  Goats are prone to developing foot scald and foot rot when conditions are wet because of the deep interdigital cleft between the toes. 

Regular foot care including foot-bathing where necessary will assist with maintaining good hoof health and minimising lameness. In many animals, judicious hoof trimming and foot baths of zinc or copper sulphate will achieve the desired result.

Skin acclimatisation 

Goats need time to acclimatise to changing conditions when they are moved from indoors to outdoors. White haired and pink skinned goats that are not accustomed to being in direct sunlight may become sunburnt if moved outside their housing area, e.g. when barns are being cleaned out.

Introduction

The overriding consideration during emergency humane destruction is to prevent the animal from suffering further pain or distress. Humane killing depends on rapidly inducing failure of brain function. This can be achieved by causing sufficient brain damage to render the animal insensible and then cutting the major blood vessels of the neck to cause heart failure and death. 

There are a number of methods that may be used for the humane and effective killing of goats on farm.

Example indicators for minimum standard No. 19: Emergency humane destruction

• Written farm procedures identify the appropriate methods used for humane destruction of unwanted animals.
• Stock handlers who carry out the humane destruction of goats are trained in appropriate routines.
• Stunned goats do not recover consciousness and death occurs rapidly after any stunning procedure.

Recommended best practice

1. Free-bullet firearms should never be used at point blank range. Shotguns and rifles should be at least 10 cm from the head when aimed.
2. Captive bolt firearms, of a suitable design and calibre, should be used to render animals insensible.
3. Wherever possible, emergency slaughter of goats should be conducted discreetly and at a site distant from other animals so as not to cause anxiety to other goats.

General information

Whenever a firearm is used, it is very important that the operator is competent to use it and takes care in ensuring the safety of themselves and other animals. 

There are two types of captive bolt firearm – penetrating and non-penetrating. A penetrating captive bolt enters the skull and comes into contact with brain tissue; a non-penetrative captive bolt employs a "mushroom" percussive head. Both methods provide a concussive blow to the skull, resulting in insensibility because of brain tissue damage, although the damage caused by the penetrating captive bolt will result in less chance of the animal regaining sensibility.

The correct position and direction of aim are critical for the humane and effective killing of goats and kids.

Hornless goats

Hornled goats

Figure source: Based on Humane Slaughter Association (2005) Guidance Notes No. 3: Humane Killing of Livestock Using Firearms. Published by the Humane Slaughter Association, The Old School, Brewhouse Hill, Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire AL4 8AN, UK. Humane Slaughter Association.

Introduction

A quality assurance programme that provides written procedures is a useful tool to ensure that standards of animal welfare and husbandry are maintained, especially on commercial farms of all types. As well as providing for the minimum standards and recommendations for best practice of this Code, a quality assurance programme will enable the meeting of statutory requirements such as the recording of animal treatments to prepare Animal Status Declaration forms.

Meat and game processing requirements

Recommended best practice

1. To ensure that standards of animal welfare and husbandry are maintained, each farm should have a quality assurance programme that provides documented animal health and welfare procedures.
2. The elements of the quality assurance programme should provide for the minimum standards and, where possible, the recommendations for best practice of this Code.
3. The quality assurance programme should enable all incidents resulting in significant sickness, injury or death of animals to be investigated and documented.
4. The quality assurance programme should incorporate continual review of existing systems, procedures and training schedules that could enhance the welfare of goats.
5. The quality assurance programme should include a record of problem issues identified and the remedial action taken.

Act                              

The Animal Welfare Act 1999.

adverse weather                        

Unfavourable weather conditions that may cause cold or heat stress.

Angora                             

A goat that produces mohair fibre.

animal                              

As defined in the Act:

1. 1. Means any live member of the animal kingdom that is –
      1. A mammal; or
      2. A bird; or
      3. A reptile; or
      4. An amphibian; or
      5. A fish (bony or cartilaginous); or
      6. Any octopus, squid, crab, lobster, or crayfish (including freshwater crayfish); or
      7. Any other member of the animal kingdom which is declared from time to time by the Governor-General, by Order in Council, to be an animal for the purposes of this Act; and
   2. Includes any mammalian foetus, or any avian or reptilian pre-hatched young, that is in the last half of its period of gestation or development; and
   3. Includes any marsupial pouch young; but
   4. Does not include –
      1. A human being; or
      2. Except as provided in paragraph (b) or paragraph (c) of this definition, any animal in the pre-natal, pre-hatched, larval, or other such developmental stage.

available technology   

NAWAC takes ‘available technology’ to represent, for example, existing chemicals, drugs, instruments, devices and facilities that are used practically to care for and manage animals.

automated feeding system                  

An electronically controlled system for feeding groups of animals.

body condition score (condition score)                      

A 0 to 5 scoring system used to classify the condition of animals, based on the assessed amount of fat and/or muscle covering they have (see Schedule II – Body Condition Scoring (BCS)).

browse                        

Green feed that is obtained from plants other than pasture e.g. trees and shrubs.

buck (billy)                              

An uncastrated male goat.

CAE                            

Caprine arthritis-encephalitis, a viral disease of goats that can be transmitted through colostrum or milk.

cashmere                    

The downy undercoat fibre produced by some goats especially as part of their winter coat, and a term that is also used when referring to those goats that have a double coat.

colostrum                   

Milk secreted by the doe for the first few days after kidding, characterised by high protein and antibody content.

cover comb                 

See ‘winter comb’.

cut-and-carry feeding  

The practice of harvesting fresh feed and transporting it to housed goats.

dag

A clot of matted fibre and excrement found on (or removed from) the hindquarters of a goat.

dagging                      

Removal of dags from a goat’s hindquarters.

doe (nanny)                 

An adult female goat.

drying off                    

The management technique of ceasing to milk does that are still lactating so that their milk production stops.

electric prodder

A device that is capable of delivering an electric shock to make an animal move, but does not include electric stunners use to stun an animal immediately before slaughter or electric devices used on animals by the New Zealand Police.

farm facilities              

All structures and equipment used to manage goats, such as buildings, yards, races, fences, gates, loading ramps, restraining devices and drains.

feral

A goat living in a wild, self-maintaining state which crosses farm boundaries freely and which may from time to time be mustered by landowners. The legal definition of "wild animal" in the Wild Animal Control Act 1978 includes any goat that is not: (A) held behind effective fences or otherwise constrained; or (B) identified in accordance with an animal identification device approved under the National Animal Identification and Tracing Act 2012 or in accordance with an identification system approved under section 50 of the Biosecurity Act 1993 and approved by the Director-General for the purposes of this Act.

food/feed                    

The words "food" and "feed" are used interchangeably.

foster                                      

A management practice whereby a kid is moved soon after birth, to be fed by a doe that is not its mother.

game estate                

See ‘safari park’.

goad

An object used to make an animal move, but does not include an electric prodder.

goatling/ yearling        

A young goat, the goatling being a female before completion of the first lactation. The term goatling is more commonly used in the dairy goat industry while the terms hogget and yearling are more commonly used in the fibre and meat goat industries. For simplicity, the terms goatling or yearling are used throughout this Code.

good practice              

A standard of care that has a general level of acceptance among knowledgeable practitioners and experts in the field; is based on good sense and sound judgement; is practical and thorough; has robust experiential or scientific foundations; and prevents unreasonable or unnecessary harm to, or promotes the interests of, the animals to which it is applied. Good practice also takes account of the evolution of attitudes about animals and their care.

housed goat                

A goat kept full time in a barn.

husbandry                              

Care and management practices in goat production.

hypothermia               

Abnormally low body temperature.

ill-treat                        

As defined in the Act, "ill-treat", in relation to an animal, means causing the animal to suffer, by any act or omission, pain or distress that in its kind or degree, or in its object, or in the circumstances in which it is inflicted, is unreasonable or unnecessary.

kid                              

A weaned or unweaned young goat less than approximately 4 months of age.

kidding                       

Giving birth to kids.

kPa                             

A kilo-Pascal – a pressure measurement used in this Code with respect to milking machine testing.

Lame goat

A goat that —

1. is not weight bearing on 1 or more limbs when moving or standing; or
2. has difficulty walking and holds its head below its backline almost continuously.

lifter                            

A plate with sleds that is screwed underneath a conventional shearing comb raising it by 2.5 mm ensuring a greater layer of fibre is left, providing insulation for the shorn goat.

loafing barn                

A roofed shelter where animals may be housed permanently and/or which provides shelter from inclement weather and where animals may be fed.

lux                              

International measure of light intensity.

minimum standards    

Minimum standards provide the details of specific actions persons in charge need to take in order to meet the obligations of the Act. They are identified in the text by a heading, and use the word "must" or similar. They are highlighted in boxes within the text.

newborn                     

A recently born kid less than 48 hours old. 

owner                         

As defined in the Act, "owner", in relation to an animal, includes the parent or guardian of a person under the age of 16 years who:

1. Owns the animal; and
2. Is a member of a parent’s or guardian’s household, living with and dependent on the parent or guardian.

pain relief

Any anaesthetic, analgesic, or sedation administered with the aim of providing effective and significant alleviation of pain.

patch shearing            

A technique for shearing cashmere-bearing goats in which only the areas growing harvestable cashmere are shorn.

person in charge                     

As defined in the Act, "person in charge", in relation to an animal, includes a person who has the animal in that person’s possession or custody, or under that person’s care, control, or supervision.

recommended best practice                            

The best practice agreed at a particular time, following consideration of scientific information, accumulated experience and public submissions on the code. It is usually a higher standard of practice than the minimum standard, except where the minimum standard is best practice. It is a practice that can be varied as new information comes to light.

Recommendations for best practice will be particularly appropriate where it is desirable to promote or encourage better care for animals than is provided as a minimum standard.

Recommended best practices are identified in the text by a heading, and generally use the word "should".

safari park                              

Has the same meaning given to it by section 2(1) of the Wild Animal Control Act 1977. Also called ‘game estate’.

scientific knowledge   

Knowledge within animal-based scientific disciplines, especially those that deal with nutritional, environmental, health, behavioural and cognitive/neural functions, which are relevant to understanding the physical, health and behavioural needs of animals. Such knowledge is not haphazard or anecdotal; it is generated by rigorous and systematic application of the scientific method, and the results are objectively and critically reviewed before acceptance.

stock handler              

A person who undertakes the immediate day-to-day husbandry tasks associated with looking after animals.

surgical reproductive procedure

Includes a procedure that involves -

1. cutting into or piercing the abdominal cavity for the purpose of artificial insemination or for the purpose of harvesting, transferring, or implanting embryos; or
2. transvaginal techniques that involve piercing the vaginal wall.

Does not include a procedure carried out for the primary purpose of desexing or the delivery of offspring.

teaser                         

A goat used to sexually tease, and perhaps copulate with, another goat of the opposite sex but not achieve fertilisation.  Female teasers are used in semen collection, while teaser bucks may be used to stimulate cycling or to identify oestrus females.

tether                                      

To restrain, fasten or tie up by the head or neck with a rope, chain, collar or halter. 

transcervical insemination

A procedure to deliver sperm directly to the uterus through the cervix using a catheter and may involve either or both of the following:  

1. deep abdominal palpation:
2. using an endoscope.

weaning                      

The act of permanently removing milk (or milk replacer) from the diet of the kid. 

winter or "cover" comb           

A shearing comb with a wider than conventional comb throat between its teeth and with a rail under every second tooth that ensures a greater layer of fibre is left on the shorn goat.

Schedule 1 electric prodder: amended on 27 August 2020 by section 25(1) of the Animal Welfare (Care and Procedures) Amendment Regulations 2020

Schedule 1 pain relief: inserted on 9 May 2021 by section 25(2) of the Animal Welfare (Care and Procedures) Amendment Regulations 2020

Schedule 1 surgical reproductive procedure: inserted on 9 May 2021 by section 25(2) of the Animal Welfare (Care and Procedures) Amendment Regulations 2020

Schedule 1 transcervical insemination: inserted on 9 May 2021 by section 25(2) of the Animal Welfare (Care and Procedures) Amendment Regulations 2020

This Appendix is not part of the Code of Welfare but is included as a reference

Although efforts to include relevant regulations within this Code have been made, there may be other regulations which are relevant to you. The full list of all animal welfare regulations should be consulted where appropriate.

Animal Welfare (Care and Procedures) Regulations 2018 – NZ Legislation

3: Interpretation

In these regulations, unless the context otherwise requires,—

• dehorn means to remove the horn or any part of the horn (including any regrowth after disbudding) from an animal by amputation, but does not include —
  1. removal of the hard insensitive tip of the horn resulting in a blunt hard end; or
  2. removal of an ingrown horn (as described in regulation 38(4)(a) or (b)) within 3cm of the point where the tip of the horn touches or breaks the surface of the skin or touches the eyelid or surface of the eye
• disbud means to destroy, by any method, free-floating immature horn tissue
• high tension band means a band that is mechanically tightened during application, with tension maintained by a crimp or similar device when the band is released from the applicator
• pain relief means any anaesthetic, analgesia, or sedation administered with the aim of providing significant alleviation of pain
• prolapse means the displacement of an organ or anatomical structure from its normal position
• skin abrasion means an injury where the skin has started to scrape or rub away, but does not include (by itself) hair loss
• slaughter premises means premises designed and operated for the purpose of, or for purposes that include, slaughtering animals
• supernumerary teat means an extra teat in excess of the normal number of teats
• tether means any form of restraint that secures any part of an animal to an object or the ground
• transporter means a person who is in charge of an animal only for the purpose of transport

16: Tethered goats must have access to food, water, and shelter

1. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a goat that is tethered must ensure that, at all times while the goat is tethered, the goat has access to—
   1. food; and
   2. water; and
   3. shelter that is fully shaded, dry, and provides protection from extremes of heat and cold.
2. Subclause (1) does not apply when the goat is temporarily tethered under constant supervision to facilitate handling of the goat for therapeutic purposes, including preventative treatment.
3. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $900.
4. The offence in subclause (3) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $300.

17: Goats with ingrown horns

1. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a goat must not allow a horn to become ingrown to the extent that any part of the horn (other than the base of the horn) pierces or inflames any part of the goat’s body or causes a skin abrasion.
2. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $1,500.
3. The offence in subclause (2) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.

30: Prevention of injury

1. A person must not transport a cattle beast, deer, sheep, goat, or pig in a manner that causes acute injury to the animal.
2. A person who transports a cattle beast, deer, sheep, goat, or pig must not load the animal onto a vehicle, or unload the animal from a vehicle, in a manner that causes acute injury to the animal.
3. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding,—
   1. in the case of an individual, $1,500; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate that has been issued an infringement notice for the offence, $1,500; or
   3. in the case of a body corporate that has not been issued an infringement notice for the offence (because proceedings in respect of the infringement offence have been commenced by filing a charging document), $7,500.
4. The offence in subclause (3) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.
5. In this regulation, acute injury—
   1. means an injury that is more than minor and is bleeding; but
   2. does not include back-rub (as defined in regulation 32(4)); and
   3. does not include an injury from horns or antlers to which regulation 31 applies.

31: Transport of animals with horns and antlers

1. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal with horns or antlers must not transport the animal, or allow the animal to be transported, in a manner that allows the animal to seriously injure itself or another animal.
2. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $1,500.
3. The offence in subclause (2) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.
4. In this regulation, seriously injure means to cause—
   1. external bleeding or extensive internal bruising; or
   2. bleeding or broken horns; or
   3. bleeding, discharging, or broken velvet antlers or pedicles.

32: Prevention of back-rub

1. A person must not transport a cattle beast, deer, sheep, goat, or pig in a manner that causes back-rub.
2. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding,—
   1. in the case of an individual, $1,500; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate that has been issued an infringement notice for the offence, $1,500; or
   3. in the case of a body corporate that has not been issued an infringement notice for the offence (because proceedings in respect of the infringement offence have been commenced by filing a charging document), $7,500.
3. The offence in subclause (2) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.
4. In this regulation, back-rub means a skin abrasion that—
   1. is bleeding or discharging; and
   2. is located on the head, hips, neck, spine, or high points on the back; and
   3. covers a combined area of more than 50 cm2.

38: Restrictions on transporting animals with ingrown horns

1. This regulation applies in respect of an animal with an ingrown horn that involves part of the horn (other than the base of the horn) piercing or inflaming any part of the animal’s body or causing a skin abrasion.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal in respect of which this regulation applies must not transport the animal, or allow the animal to be transported, unless—
   1. the animal is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that states that the animal is fit for transport; or
   2. the animal is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that specifies conditions that must be complied with to manage the animal welfare risks associated with the transport and the owner, or person in charge, complies with all relevant conditions.
3. However, the owner of, or person in charge of, an animal with an ingrown horn to which this subclause applies may, for the purpose of treatment, transport the animal—
   1. within the property on which the animal resides; or
   2. to another property (not being slaughter premises), part or all of which is less than 20 km from the boundary of the property on which the animal resides.
4. Subclause (3) applies if the ingrown horn—
   1. touches or breaks the surface of the skin, but does not touch any other tissue; or
   2. touches the eyelid or surface of the eye, but does not touch any other tissue.
5. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $1,500.
6. The offence in subclause (5) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.

39: Restrictions on transporting animals with injured horns or antlers

1. This regulation—
   1. applies in respect of an animal with a bleeding, discharging, or broken (and unhealed) velvet antler, horn, or pedicle; but
   2. does not apply in respect of a deer if the bleeding or discharge is a result of the deer naturally casting its antlers.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal in respect of which this regulation applies must not transport the animal, or allow the animal to be transported, unless—
   1. the animal is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that states that the animal is fit for transport; or
   2. the animal is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that specifies conditions that must be complied with to manage the animal welfare risks associated with the transport and the owner, or person in charge, complies with all relevant conditions; or
   3. the animal is a deer to which subclause (4) applies.
3. However, the owner of, or person in charge of, the animal may, for the purpose of treatment, transport the animal—
   1. within the property on which the animal resides; or
   2. to another property (not being slaughter premises), part or all of which is less than 20 km from the boundary of the property on which the animal resides.
4. The owner of, or person in charge of, a deer to which this regulation applies may transport the deer, or allow the deer to be transported, to a slaughter premises if—
   1. the deer is a yearling deer; and
   2. this regulation applies because the deer’s first set of velvet antlers were removed; and
   3. rubber rings designed for the purpose of inducing analgesia during velvet antler removal were used for pain relief and are still attached to the deer; and
   4. the deer arrives at the slaughter premises no later than 72 hours after the velvet antlers were removed.
5. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $1,500.
6. The offence in subclause (5) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.

40: Restrictions on transporting lame animals

1. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a cattle beast, sheep, deer, pig, or goat that is lame must not transport the animal, or allow the animal to be transported, unless—
   1. the animal is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that states that the animal is fit for transport; or
   2. the animal is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that specifies conditions that must be complied with to manage the animal welfare risks associated with the transport and the owner or person in charge complies with all relevant conditions.
2. However, the owner of, or person in charge of, the animal may, for the purpose of treatment, transport the animal—
   1. within the property on which the animal resides; or
   2. to another property (not being slaughter premises), part or all of which is less than 20 km from the boundary of the property on which the animal resides.
3. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding,—
   1. in the case of an individual, $1,500; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate that has been issued an infringement notice for the offence, $1,500; or
   3. in the case of a body corporate that has not been issued an infringement notice for the offence (because proceedings in respect of the infringement offence have been commenced by filing a charging document), $7,500.
4. The offence in subclause (3) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.
5. In this regulation,—
   1. a cattle beast, deer, or pig is lame if—
      1. the animal is not weight bearing on 1 or more limbs when moving or standing; or
      2. the animal has a definite limp (shortened stride) that is clearly identifiable to a limb or limbs, with weight placed on the limb or limbs significantly reduced:
   2. a cattle beast, deer, or pig is not lame if the cause of the limp is a nonpainful condition (such as a conformational fault, a gait abnormality, or a healed injury) and the animal is able to bear weight (although not necessarily evenly) on all 4 limbs:
   3. a sheep or goat is lame if—
      1. the animal is not weight bearing on 1 or more limbs when moving or standing; or
      2. the animal has difficulty walking and holds its head below its backline almost continuously.

41: Restrictions on transporting animals in late pregnancy

1. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a cattle beast, sheep, pig, or goat that is in late pregnancy must not transport the animal, or allow the animal to be transported, unless—
   1. the animal is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that states that the animal is fit for transport; or
   2. the animal is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that specifies conditions that must be complied with to manage the animal welfare risks associated with the transport and the owner, or person in charge, complies with all relevant conditions.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a pregnant deer must not transport the deer if it is in late pregnancy or within 21 days before the estimated due date, unless—
   1. the deer is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that states that the animal is fit for transport; or
   2. the deer is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that specifies conditions that must be complied with to manage the animal welfare risks associated with the transport and the owner, or person in charge, complies with all relevant conditions.
3. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a pregnant deer must have a system in place that, if followed, will ensure compliance with subclause (2).
4. A person who fails to comply with subclause (1) or (2) commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding,—
   1. in the case of an individual, $1,500; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate that has been issued an infringement notice for the offence, $1,500; or
   3. in the case of a body corporate that has not been issued an infringement notice for the offence (because proceedings in respect of the infringement offence have been commenced by filing a charging document), $7,500.
5. The offence in subclause (4) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.
6. For the purpose of section 162(1) of the Animal Welfare Act 1999, an inspector has reasonable cause to believe that a person has transported an animal that is in late pregnancy if the animal gives birth during transport or within 24 hours after arriving at a slaughter premises or sale yard.
7. An infringement notice may not be issued, and a charging document may not be filed, in relation to a failure to comply with subclause (1) unless the animal gives birth during transport or within 24 hours after arriving at a slaughter premises or sale yard.
8. An infringement notice may not be issued, and a charging document may not be filed, in relation to a failure to comply with subclause (2) involving a deer that is in late pregnancy (but not a deer that is within 21 days before the estimated due date) unless the deer gives birth during transport or within 24 hours after arriving at a slaughter premises or sale yard.

42: Restrictions on transporting animals with injured or diseased udders

1. This regulation applies in respect of a cattle beast, sheep, or goat that has—
   1. a necrotic udder; or
   2. an udder that has a discharge other than milk; or
   3. an udder that shows signs of inflammation (such as being red, hot, or swollen); or
   4. an udder with a lesion that is bleeding or discharging.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal to which this regulation applies must not transport the animal, or allow the animal to be transported, unless—
   1. the animal is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that states that the animal is fit for transport; or
   2. the animal is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that specifies conditions that must be complied with to manage the animal welfare risks associated with the transport and the owner, or person in charge, complies with all relevant conditions.
3. However, the owner of, or person in charge of, the animal may, for the purpose of treatment, transport the animal—
   1. within the property on which the animal resides; or
   2. to another property (not being slaughter premises), part or all of which is less than 20 km from the boundary of the property on which the animal resides.
4. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding,—
   1. in the case of an individual, $1,500; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate that has been issued an infringement notice for the offence, $1,500; or
   3. in the case of a body corporate that has not been issued an infringement notice for the offence (because proceedings in respect of the infringement offence have been commenced by filing a charging document), $7,500.
5. The offence in subclause (4) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.

43: Restrictions on transporting animals with eye cancer

1. This regulation applies in respect of a cattle beast, sheep, or goat that has an eye cancer that—
   1. is bleeding or discharging; or
   2. is not visibly confined to either the tissues of the eye or of the eyelid; or
   3. is causing the eye to discharge; or
   4. is more than 2 cm in diameter.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal to which this regulation applies must not transport the animal, or allow the animal to be transported, unless—
   1. the animal is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that states that the animal is fit for transport; or
   2. the animal is accompanied by a veterinary certificate that specifies conditions that must be complied with to manage the animal welfare risks associated with the transport and the owner, or person in charge, complies with all relevant conditions.
3. However, the owner of, or person in charge of, the animal may, for the purpose of treatment, transport the animal—
   1. within the property on which the animal resides; or
   2. to another property (not being slaughter premises), part or all of which is less than 20 km from the boundary of the property on which the animal resides.
4. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $1,500.
5. The offence in subclause (4) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.

44: Certain regulations do not apply to transporters

Regulations 33(1), 35(2), and 38 to 43 do not apply to transporters.

45: Obligations of transporters in relation to animals to which regulations 38 to 43 apply

1. A transporter who transports an animal to which any of regulations 38 to 43 apply and that is accompanied by a veterinary certificate must comply with any relevant conditions specified in the certificate.
2. A transporter who transports a yearling deer to which regulation 39(4) applies must ensure that the deer arrives at the slaughter premises no later than 72 hours after the deer’s velvet antlers were removed.
3. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $1,500.
4. The offence in subclause (3) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.

47: Collars and tethers

1. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal must ensure that any collar or tether on the animal (whether on the neck or on any other part of the animal) does not—
   1. cause a cut that bleeds or discharges; or
   2. cause a skin abrasion that bleeds or discharges; or
   3. cause a swelling; or
   4. prevent the animal from breathing normally, panting, or drinking.
2. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $900.
3. The offence in subclause (2) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $300.

48: Use of electric prodders

1. A person must not use an electric prodder on any animal, except—
   1. on cattle that weigh over 150 kg; or
   2. during loading or unloading for transport, on pigs that weigh over 150 kg; or
   3. during loading of a stunning pen at any slaughter premises, —
      1. on pigs that weigh over 150 kg; or
      2. on pigs that weigh over 70 kg if the pigs are in a single-file slaughter race leading into, and within 15 m of, the stunning pen; or
   4. during loading of a stunning pen at any slaughter premises, on deer of any weight.
2. If an electric prodder is used on an animal where permitted by subclause (1), —
   1. the prodder may be used only on the muscled areas of the animal’s hindquarters or forequarters; and
   2. the animal must have sufficient room to move away from the prodder.
3. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding, —
   1. in the case of an individual, $1,500; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate that has been issued an infringement notice for the offence, $1,500; or
   3. in the case of a body corporate that has not been issued an infringement notice for the offence (because proceedings in respect of the infringement offence have been commenced by filing a charging document), $7,500.
4. The offence in subclause (3) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.
5. In this regulation, electric prodder—
   1. means a device that is capable of delivering an electric shock to make an animal move; but
   2. does not include—
      1. electric stunners used to stun an animal immediately before slaughter; or
      2. electric devices used on an animal by the New Zealand Police.

49: Prodding animals in sensitive areas

1. A person must not strike or prod an animal with a goad in the udder, anus, genitals, or eyes.
2. A person who fails to comply with this regulation commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $1,500.
3. The offence in subclause (2) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.
4. In this regulation, goad means an object used to make an animal move, but does not include an electric prodder as defined in regulation 48(5).

55A: Castrating goats

1. A person must not castrate a goat that is over 6 months of age unless throughout the procedure the goat is under the influence of pain relief that is authorised by a veterinarian for the purpose of the procedure.
2. A person must not castrate a goat (of any age) using a high tension band unless throughout the procedure the goat is under the influence of pain relief that is authorised by a veterinarian for the purpose of the procedure.
3. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a goat must not allow the goat to be castrated in breach of subclause (1) or (2).
4. A person who castrates a goat must—
   1. be experienced with, or have received training in, the correct use of the method being used; and
   2. be able to recognise early signs of significant distress, injury, or ill-health so that the person can take prompt remedial action or seek advice.
5. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a goat that is to be castrated must ensure that the health and welfare needs of the animal are met during the procedure and recovery, by ensuring that at all times a person is available who—
   1. has suitable equipment; and
   2. has the relevant knowledge, has received relevant training, or is under appropriate supervision.
6. A person who fails to comply with subclause (1), (2), or (3) commits an offence and is liable on conviction, —
   1. in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $3,000; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate, to a fine not exceeding $15,000.

55D: Vaginal prolapse in goats

1. A person must not treat a vaginal prolapse in a goat unless throughout the procedure the goat is under the influence of pain relief that is authorised by a veterinarian for the purpose of the procedure.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a goat must not allow its vaginal prolapse to be treated in breach of subclause (1).
3. A person who treats a vaginal prolapse in a goat must—
   1. be experienced with, or have received training in, the correct use of the method being used; and
   2. be able to recognise early signs of significant distress, injury, or ill-health so that the person can take prompt remedial action or seek advice.
4. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a goat that is treated for a vaginal prolapse must ensure that the health and welfare needs of the animal are met during the procedure and recovery, by ensuring that at all times a person is available who—
   1. has suitable equipment; and
   2. has the relevant knowledge, has received relevant training, or is under appropriate supervision.
5. A person who fails to comply with subclause (1) or (2) commits an offence and is liable on conviction, —
   1. in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $3,000; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate, to a fine not exceeding $15,000.

55G: Removing goats’ teats

1. A person must not remove a main teat from a goat of any age unless—
   1. the person is a veterinarian, or a veterinary student under the direct supervision of a veterinarian throughout the procedure; and
   2. the goat is given pain relief at the time of the procedure.
2. A person must not remove a supernumerary teat from a goat that is over 4 weeks of age unless throughout the procedure the goat is under the influence of pain relief that is authorised by a veterinarian for the purpose of the procedure.
3. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a goat must not allow a teat to be removed from a goat in breach of subclause (1) or (2).
4. A person who removes a supernumerary teat from a goat of any age must ensure that the procedure creates a clean cut and does not tear the tissue.
5. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a goat must not allow a teat to be removed from a goat in breach of subclause (4).
6. A person who removes a supernumerary teat from a goat of any age must—
   1. be experienced with, or have received training in, the correct use of the method being used; and
   2. be able to recognise early signs of significant distress, injury, or ill-health so that the person can take prompt remedial action or seek advice.
7. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a goat that is to have a supernumerary teat removed must ensure that the health and welfare needs of the animal are met during the procedure and recovery, by ensuring that at all times a person is available who—
   1. has suitable equipment; and
   2. has the relevant knowledge, has received relevant training, or is under appropriate supervision.
8. A person who fails to comply with subclause (1), (2), or (3) commits an offence and is liable on conviction, —
   1. in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $3,000; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate, to a fine not exceeding $15,000.
9. A person who fails to comply with subclause (4) or (5) commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $1,500.
10. The offence in subclause (9) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.

55L: Prohibition on hot branding of animals generally

1. A person must not hot brand an animal other than an animal to which regulation 55M applies.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal must not allow the animal to be hot branded in breach of subclause (1).
3. A person who fails to comply with subclause (1) or (2) commits an offence and is liable on conviction, —
   1. in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $5,000; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate, to a fine not exceeding $25,000.

55M: Hot branding of horses, ponies, and donkeys

1. A person must not hot brand a horse, pony, or donkey unless the horse, pony, or donkey is given pain relief that is authorised by a veterinarian for the purpose of the procedure.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a horse, pony, or donkey must not allow the horse, pony, or donkey to be hot branded in breach of subclause (1).
3. A person who hot brands a horse, pony, or donkey must—
   1. be experienced with, or have received training in, the correct use of the method being used; and
   2. be able to recognise early signs of significant distress, injury, or ill-health so that the person can take prompt remedial action or seek advice.
4. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a horse, pony, or donkey that is to be hot branded must ensure that the health and welfare needs of the animal are met during the procedure and recovery, by ensuring that at all times a person is available who—
   1. has suitable equipment; and
   2. has the relevant knowledge, has received relevant training, or is under appropriate supervision.
   3. A person who fails to comply with subclause (1) or (2) commits an offence and is liable on conviction, —
      1. in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $3,000; or
      2. in the case of a body corporate, to a fine not exceeding $15,000.
      3. In this regulation, horse, pony, or donkey—
         1. includes any hybrid of a horse, pony, or donkey; but
         2. does not include any other equids.
      4. This regulation is revoked on the date that is 5 years after the commencement date.

56D: Cutting teeth of animals

1. A person must not cut a tooth of an animal unless—
   1. the person is a veterinarian, or a veterinary student under the direct supervision of a veterinarian throughout the procedure; or
   2. the tooth is—
      1. a needle tooth of a pig that is 4 days of age or under; or
      2. a tusk of a boar; or
      3. a fighting tooth of a llama or an alpaca; or
   3. the tooth of the animal is cut under a standard operating procedure that has been approved by an animal ethics committee.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal must not allow the animal’s teeth to be cut in breach of subclause (1).
3. A person must not cut a tusk of a boar or a fighting tooth of a llama or an alpaca unless the person uses—
   1. an obstetrical wire; or
   2. a saw suitable for the purpose of dentistry.
4. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a boar, a llama, or an alpaca must not allow the tusks of the boar, or the teeth of the llama or alpaca, to be cut in breach of subclause (3).
5. A person who cuts a tooth of an animal must—
   1. be experienced with, or have received training in, the correct use of the method being used; and
   2. be able to recognise early signs of significant distress, injury, or ill-health so that the person can take prompt remedial action or seek advice.
6. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal that is to have a tooth cut must ensure that the health and welfare needs of the animal are met during the procedure and recovery, by ensuring that at all times a person is available who—
   1. has suitable equipment; and
   2. has the relevant knowledge, has received relevant training, or is under appropriate supervision.
7. A person who fails to comply with subclause (1) or (2) commits an offence and is liable on conviction, —
   1. in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $3,000; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate, to a fine not exceeding $15,000.
8. A person who fails to comply with subclause (3) or (4) commits an offence and is liable on conviction, in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $1,500.
9. The offence in subclause (8) is an infringement offence with an infringement fee of $500.
10. In this regulation, —

fighting tooth means a modified canine and incisor tooth found in the jaw between the incisors and the molars

needle tooth means any small sharp tooth in a piglet (sometimes referred to as a milk tooth), but principally a canine tooth.

57B: Disbudding goats

1. A person must not disbud a goat unless the goat is given pain relief that is authorised by a veterinarian for the purpose of the procedure.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a goat must not allow the goat to be disbudded in breach of subclause (1).
3. A person who disbuds a goat must—
   1. be experienced with, or have received training in, the correct use of the method being used; and
   2. be able to recognise early signs of significant distress, injury, or ill-health so that the person can take prompt remedial action or seek advice.
4. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a goat that is to be disbudded must ensure that the health and welfare needs of the animal are met during the procedure and recovery, by ensuring that at all times a person is available who—
   1. has suitable equipment; and
   2. has the relevant knowledge, has received relevant training, or is under appropriate supervision.
5. A person who fails to comply with subclause (1) or (2) commits an offence and is liable on conviction, —
   1. in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $3,000; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate, to a fine not exceeding $15,000.

58A: Dehorning goats

1. A person must not dehorn a goat unless the goat is given pain relief that is authorised by a veterinarian for the purpose of the procedure.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a goat must not allow it to be dehorned in breach of subclause (1).
3. A person who dehorns a goat must—
   1. be experienced with, or have received training in, the correct use of the method being used; and
   2. be able to recognise early signs of significant distress, injury, or ill-health so that the person can take prompt remedial action or seek advice.
4. The owner of, and every person in charge of, a goat that is to be dehorned must ensure that the health and welfare needs of the animal are met during the procedure and recovery, by ensuring that at all times a person is available who—
   1. has suitable equipment; and
   2. has the relevant knowledge, has received relevant training, or is under appropriate supervision.
5. A person who fails to comply with subclause (1) or (2) commits an offence and is liable on conviction, —
   1. in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $5,000; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate, to a fine not exceeding $25,000.

59A: Surgical reproductive procedures

1. A person must not perform a surgical reproductive procedure on an animal unless throughout the procedure the animal is under the influence of pain relief that is authorised by a veterinarian for the purpose of the procedure.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal must not allow the animal to have a surgical reproductive procedure performed on it in breach of subclause (1).
3. A person who performs a surgical reproductive procedure on an animal must—
   1. be experienced with, or have received training in, the correct use of the method being used; and
   2. be able to recognise early signs of significant distress, injury, or ill-health so that the person can take prompt remedial action or seek advice.
4. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal that is to have a surgical reproductive procedure performed on it must ensure that the health and welfare needs of the animal are met during the procedure and recovery, by ensuring that at all times a person is available who—
   1. has suitable equipment; and
   2. has the relevant knowledge, has received relevant training, or is under appropriate supervision.
5. A person who fails to comply with subclause (1) or (2) commits an offence and is liable on conviction, —
   1. in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $3,000; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate, to a fine not exceeding $15,000.
6. In this regulation, surgical reproductive procedure—
   1. includes a procedure that involves—
      1. cutting into or piercing the abdominal cavity for the purpose of artificial insemination or for the purpose of harvesting, transferring, or implanting embryos; or
      2. transvaginal techniques that involve piercing the vaginal wall:
   2. does not include a procedure carried out for the primary purpose of desexing or the delivery of offspring.

59B: Transcervical insemination

1. A person who performs a transcervical insemination on an animal must—
   1. be experienced with, or have received training in, the correct use of the method being used; and
   2. be able to recognise early signs of significant distress, injury, or ill-health so that the person can take prompt remedial action or seek advice.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal that is to have a transcervical insemination performed on it must ensure that the health and welfare needs of the animal are met during the procedure and recovery, by ensuring that at all times a person is available who—
   1. has suitable equipment; and
   2. has the relevant knowledge, has received relevant training, or is under appropriate supervision.
3. In this regulation, transcervical insemination means a procedure to deliver sperm directly to the uterus through the cervix using a catheter and may involve either or both of the following:
   1. deep abdominal palpation:
   2. using an endoscope.

59C: Cystocentesis

1. A person who performs cystocentesis on an animal must—
   1. be experienced with, or have received training in, the correct use of the method being used; and
   2. be able to recognise early signs of significant distress, injury, or ill-health so that the person can take prompt remedial action or seek advice.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal that is to have cystocentesis performed on it must ensure that the health and welfare needs of the animal are met during the procedure and recovery, by ensuring that at all times a person is available who—
   1. has suitable equipment; and
   2. has the relevant knowledge, has received relevant training, or is under appropriate supervision.
3. In this regulation, cystocentesis means a procedure involving the insertion of a needle through the wall of an animal’s body into the bladder to obtain urine samples.

59E: Epidurals

1. A person must not perform an epidural on an equid unless the person is a veterinarian, or a veterinary student under the direct supervision of a veterinarian throughout the procedure.
2. A person must not perform an epidural on an animal other than an equid unless the person—
   1. is a veterinarian or a veterinary student under the direct supervision of a veterinarian throughout the procedure; or
   2. injects a local anaesthetic authorised by a veterinarian for the purpose of the procedure into the epidural space.
3. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal must not allow an epidural to be performed on the animal in breach of subclause (1) or (2).
4. A person who performs an epidural on an animal other than an equid must—
   1. be experienced with, or have received training in, the correct use of the method being used; and
   2. be able to recognise early signs of significant distress, injury, or ill-health so that the person can take prompt remedial action or seek advice.
5. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal other than an equid that is to have an epidural performed on it must ensure that the health and welfare needs of the animal are met during the procedure and recovery, by ensuring that at all times a person is available who—
   1. has suitable equipment; and
   2. has the relevant knowledge, has received relevant training, or is under appropriate supervision.
6. A person who fails to comply with subclause (1), (2), or (3) commits an offence and is liable on conviction, —
   1. in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $3,000; or
   2. in the case of a body corporate, to a fine not exceeding $15,000.

59F: Urinary catheterisation

1. A person who performs a urinary catheterisation procedure on an animal must—
   1. be experienced with, or have received training in, the correct use of the method being used; and
   2. be able to recognise early signs of significant distress, injury, or ill-health so that the person can take prompt remedial action or seek advice.
2. The owner of, and every person in charge of, an animal that is to have a urinary catheterisation procedure performed on it must ensure that the health and welfare needs of the animal are met during the procedure and recovery, by ensuring that at all times a person is available who—
   1. has suitable equipment; and
   2. has the relevant knowledge, has received relevant training, or is under appropriate supervision.

Appendix replaced on 9 May 2021 by Notice in the Gazette 2021-go1589