Skip to main content

Proposed management measures for the Northland spiny rock lobster fishery (CRA 1) to help mitigate urchin barrens

Update – 15 April 2025

In March 2025, the Minister for Oceans and Fisheries considered the submissions and received advice following this engagement. The minister has directed Fisheries New Zealand to consider further management measures for the Northland spiny rock lobster (CRA 1) and packhorse rock lobster (PHC 1) fisheries under section 11 of the Fisheries Act 1996, including area closure, seasonal closure, and recreational control options.  

As outlined on this page, this engagement on a range of measures occurred in late 2024. Management measures were being considered to increase the abundance and size of rock lobster to help address urchin barrens on the east coast of Northland.

Fisheries New Zealand received 40 submissions during this engagement. Many submitters raised concerns about low spiny rock lobster abundance on the east coast of Northland and the proliferation of urchin barrens. Most submitters indicated that further regulated measures are required with mixed support between measures.

We're working to refine options for these management measures, including engaging with stakeholders. Public consultation on the management measures the minister has chosen to progress is planned to take place mid-2025. 

The total allowable catch (TAC) for CRA 1 was last adjusted in 2023 in response to a 2022 High Court judgment. The 2023 TAC decision was itself subsequently challenged. The judgment in the latest case was received on 14 February 2025. The applicants' challenge was successful, but the Court did not make an order revoking the 2023 TAC, which currently remains in place. Fisheries New Zealand considers that progressing these regulatory management measures is consistent with the 2025 High Court judgment which recognised that these types of steps are needed to manage the urchin barren problem. An appeal of the 2025 decision has been filed by the minister to clarify certain aspects of the decision. The minister's appeal does not impact the planned approach Fisheries New Zealand has for managing the urchin barren problem.

2025 High Court judgment decision for Northland rock lobster – Ministry of Justice

About urchin barrens 

Urchin barrens are areas of rocky reef that are dominated by sea urchins. The areas would normally support healthy kelp forest but have little or no kelp due to overgrazing by sea urchins. This leads to a barren seafloor with a loss of habitat and biodiversity, impacting the overall health of coastal environments. Urchin barrens are prevalent in northeastern New Zealand and pose significant ecological risks as they expand, leading to the degradation of marine ecosystems.

Engagement background

Fisheries New Zealand sought your views on management measures for the Northland spiny rock lobster fishery (CRA 1) to better manage the impact of fishing on urchin barren formation.

The feedback from this engagement informed the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries of the most appropriate measures to progress.

What was proposed?

The management measures being considered included non-regulated measures implemented by the rock lobster industry, namely: 

  • voluntary harvest limits and voluntary area/seasonal closures for 2024-25.

Regulatory measures being considered were:

  • subdivision of the CRA 1 Quota Management Area
  • adjustments to legal size requirements
  • area and/or seasonal closures
  • accumulation and/or vessel limits for recreational rock lobster fishing
  • measures to reduce recreational fishing pressure on the packhorse rock lobster (Sagmariasus verreauxi).

These proposals were part of Fisheries New Zealand’s integrated management approach to help address urchin barrens. This approach encompassed a suite of management initiatives aimed at restoring kelp forests and mitigating the adverse effects of urchin barrens. These proposed measures followed the implementation of a range of tools to facilitate the removal of urchins.

Management measures which increase the abundance and size of urchin predators (including rock lobster and snapper) are needed to support kelp forest recovery in existing barrens and to prevent the formation of new urchin barrens.

These proposals followed on from the 2023 sustainability review of CRA 1 in which the minister reduced the catch settings. The 2023 sustainability review was in response to a 2022 High Court Judgment and has been subject to further Judicial Review.

Discussion document and summary

The summary document provides a high-level overview of the proposed measures. The full discussion document provides greater detail on the measures and wider considerations.

Management measures for the Northland spiny rock lobster fishery (CRA 1): full discussion document [PDF, 2.9 MB]

Management measures for the Northland spiny rock lobster fishery (CRA 1): summary document [PDF, 1.6 MB]

Related information

CRA 1 sustainability round review April 2023: Review of sustainability measures for fisheries – April 2023 round

2022 High Court judgment decision for Northland rock lobster – Ministry of Justice

SUR 1A and 1B sustainability round review October 2023: Review of sustainability measures for fisheries – October 2023 round

Review of the recreational daily kina limit in Fishery Management Area 1 (July 2024)

Decision on special permit to enable the removal of sea urchins for the management or prevention of urchin barrens (July 2024)

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation